Constitutional Impediments In Criminal Procedure Identification Act 2022: At A Glance

Dr. Kapil Chaurpagar
{"title":"Constitutional Impediments In Criminal Procedure Identification Act 2022: At A Glance","authors":"Dr. Kapil Chaurpagar","doi":"10.55662/salrj.2022.805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An investigation is a critical component of criminal procedure. Investigation is closely related to collection of evidence and identification of the accused. The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022 has significantly altered criminal identification methods. It supersedes the Identification of Prisoners Act of 1920. The concept of measurements was restricted in previous legislation, but it now encompasses almost every biological material as a measurement. The information specified under the Act forms part of the personal data of individuals and is thus protected under the right to privacy of individuals. In 2017 Supreme Court of India in historic judgment has held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right. It may also fail Article 14 requirements of a law to be fair and reasonable and for equality under the law. The important challenges involved in this Act are that data can be collected not only from convicted individuals, but also from individuals arrested for any offence and from any other person to aid an investigation. Compulsory taking of measurements of an accused would come within the mischief of Article 20 (3). Act enables coercive drawing of samples and possibly involves a violation of Article 20(3), which protects the right against self-incrimination. Therefore, scope for arbitrariness is present in this Act which can possibly misused by the police authorities.","PeriodicalId":131737,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Law Review Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Law Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55662/salrj.2022.805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An investigation is a critical component of criminal procedure. Investigation is closely related to collection of evidence and identification of the accused. The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022 has significantly altered criminal identification methods. It supersedes the Identification of Prisoners Act of 1920. The concept of measurements was restricted in previous legislation, but it now encompasses almost every biological material as a measurement. The information specified under the Act forms part of the personal data of individuals and is thus protected under the right to privacy of individuals. In 2017 Supreme Court of India in historic judgment has held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right. It may also fail Article 14 requirements of a law to be fair and reasonable and for equality under the law. The important challenges involved in this Act are that data can be collected not only from convicted individuals, but also from individuals arrested for any offence and from any other person to aid an investigation. Compulsory taking of measurements of an accused would come within the mischief of Article 20 (3). Act enables coercive drawing of samples and possibly involves a violation of Article 20(3), which protects the right against self-incrimination. Therefore, scope for arbitrariness is present in this Act which can possibly misused by the police authorities.
《2022年刑事程序鉴定法》中的宪法障碍:概览
调查是刑事诉讼程序的一个重要组成部分。调查与收集证据和查明被告密切相关。《2022年刑事诉讼(鉴定)法》对刑事鉴定方法进行了重大改革。它取代了1920年的《囚犯身份法》。测量的概念在以前的立法中受到限制,但现在它几乎涵盖了所有作为测量的生物材料。该法规定的信息构成个人资料的一部分,因此受到个人隐私权的保护。2017年,印度最高法院在历史性的判决中认为,隐私权是一项基本权利。它也可能不符合法律第14条关于公平合理和法律之下人人平等的要求。该法所涉及的重要挑战是,不仅可以从被定罪的个人收集数据,也可以从因任何罪行而被捕的个人和任何其他人收集数据,以协助调查。强制对被告进行测量属于第20条第3款的损害范围。该法允许强制抽取样品,并可能涉及违反第20条第3款,该条保护不自证其罪的权利。因此,该法中存在任意的余地,这可能被警察当局滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信