ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF HEART VALVE PROSTHESES WITH FLEXIBLE SUPPORTING FRAME COMPARED WITH THE CLASSIC STENTED PROSTHESES: EVALUATION OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC INDICATORS OF THE “UNILINE” AND “TIARA” BIOPROSTHESES

K. Klyshnikov, E. Ovcharenko, L. Barbarash
{"title":"ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF HEART VALVE PROSTHESES WITH FLEXIBLE SUPPORTING FRAME COMPARED WITH THE CLASSIC STENTED PROSTHESES: EVALUATION OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC INDICATORS OF THE “UNILINE” AND “TIARA” BIOPROSTHESES","authors":"K. Klyshnikov, E. Ovcharenko, L. Barbarash","doi":"10.17802/2306-1278-2023-12-2-70-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsThe «TiAra» bioprosthetic heart valves have better hemodynamic characteristics, such as higher effective orifice area and a lower mean pressure gradient.The «UniLine» bioprosthetic heart valve demonstrated better closing dynamic, expressed in a smaller regurgitation volume. Aim. To assess hydrodynamic characteristics of the «TiAra» bioprosthetic heart valve with flexible supporting frame compared with the classic stented «UniLine» bioprosthetic aortic valve.Methods. Using the Vivitro Pulse Duplicator (Vivitro Labs, Canada), we simulated the function of the heart via generating pulsatile flow to analyze bioprosthetic heart valves. To comprehensively assess the bioprosthesis function, three valves of each standard size (21, 23, 25 mm) were submitted to hydrodynamic testing, thus making a sample of nine bioprostheses of each model. The article provides the analysis of  the effective orifice area, mean pressure gradient, regurgitation volume, and assessment of the statistical sensitivity of the parameters between groups at p = 0.05.Results. The assessment revealed that the «TiAra» bioprosthesis has bigger effective orifice area (p = 0.006) and lower mean pressure gradient (p = 0.02): 1.6–2.2 cm2 and 3.6–6.3 mmHg versus 1.08–1.73 cm2 and 4.8–12.1 mmHg, respectively. The regurgitation volume, however, was lower in the «UniLine» bioprostheses 0.8–4.1 mL/cycle versus 6.2–9.0 mL/cycle (p = 0.0004).Conclusion. Despite the fact that both studied models showed good hydrodynamic performance, the prosthesis with the flexible supporting frame («TiAra») showed better results regarding its effectiveness in vitro via presenting with bigger effective orifice area and lower mean pressure gradient. At the same time, the «UniLine» stented bioprosthesis had lower regurgitation volume, i.e. better closing dynamics.","PeriodicalId":227108,"journal":{"name":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2023-12-2-70-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HighlightsThe «TiAra» bioprosthetic heart valves have better hemodynamic characteristics, such as higher effective orifice area and a lower mean pressure gradient.The «UniLine» bioprosthetic heart valve demonstrated better closing dynamic, expressed in a smaller regurgitation volume. Aim. To assess hydrodynamic characteristics of the «TiAra» bioprosthetic heart valve with flexible supporting frame compared with the classic stented «UniLine» bioprosthetic aortic valve.Methods. Using the Vivitro Pulse Duplicator (Vivitro Labs, Canada), we simulated the function of the heart via generating pulsatile flow to analyze bioprosthetic heart valves. To comprehensively assess the bioprosthesis function, three valves of each standard size (21, 23, 25 mm) were submitted to hydrodynamic testing, thus making a sample of nine bioprostheses of each model. The article provides the analysis of  the effective orifice area, mean pressure gradient, regurgitation volume, and assessment of the statistical sensitivity of the parameters between groups at p = 0.05.Results. The assessment revealed that the «TiAra» bioprosthesis has bigger effective orifice area (p = 0.006) and lower mean pressure gradient (p = 0.02): 1.6–2.2 cm2 and 3.6–6.3 mmHg versus 1.08–1.73 cm2 and 4.8–12.1 mmHg, respectively. The regurgitation volume, however, was lower in the «UniLine» bioprostheses 0.8–4.1 mL/cycle versus 6.2–9.0 mL/cycle (p = 0.0004).Conclusion. Despite the fact that both studied models showed good hydrodynamic performance, the prosthesis with the flexible supporting frame («TiAra») showed better results regarding its effectiveness in vitro via presenting with bigger effective orifice area and lower mean pressure gradient. At the same time, the «UniLine» stented bioprosthesis had lower regurgitation volume, i.e. better closing dynamics.
柔性支撑框架心脏瓣膜假体与经典支架假体的优缺点:“单线”和“冠状”生物假体的流体力学指标评价
“TiAra”生物瓣膜具有更好的血流动力学特性,如更高的有效孔口面积和更低的平均压力梯度。“UniLine”生物人工心脏瓣膜表现出更好的关闭动态,表现为更小的反流量。的目标。比较具有柔性支撑框架的“TiAra”生物人工心脏瓣膜与经典的“UniLine”生物人工主动脉瓣膜的流体动力学特性。利用体外脉冲复制器(Vivitro Pulse Duplicator, Vivitro Labs, Canada),我们通过产生脉动流来模拟心脏的功能,以分析生物人工心脏瓣膜。为了综合评估生物假体的功能,我们将每个标准尺寸(21、23、25 mm)的3个瓣膜进行水动力测试,每个模型制作9个生物假体样本。分析了有效孔口面积、平均压力梯度、返流容积,并在p = 0.05的条件下评价了组间参数的统计敏感性。评估结果显示,TiAra生物假体的有效孔面积更大(p = 0.006),平均压力梯度更低(p = 0.02),分别为1.6 ~ 2.2 cm2和3.6 ~ 6.3 mmHg,而1.08 ~ 1.73 cm2和4.8 ~ 12.1 mmHg。然而,“UniLine”生物假体的反流量为0.8-4.1 mL/循环,低于6.2-9.0 mL/循环(p = 0.0004)。尽管两种模型均表现出良好的水动力性能,但采用柔性支撑框架的假体(«TiAra»)具有更大的有效孔面积和更低的平均压力梯度,在体外的有效性方面表现出更好的效果。同时,“UniLine”支架生物假体具有更低的反流量,即更好的闭合动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信