G. Büyüközkan, Celal Alpay Havle, O. Feyzioğlu, Deniz Uztürk
{"title":"Integrated Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Sustainable Energy Technology Selection","authors":"G. Büyüközkan, Celal Alpay Havle, O. Feyzioğlu, Deniz Uztürk","doi":"10.1145/3386762.3391921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing world population and industrial steps taken to meet consumption, the need for energy has increased. Today, the increasing demand for energy of the countries that consider their economic growth has increased their energy consumption. This has led to a global energy crisis. The rapid depletion of energy resources in the world has led countries to look for new resources. The necessity of sustainable energy has made renewable resources a new target. At this point, the selection of the best energy technology becomes important. Hence, this study aims to select the most appropriate sustainable energy technology with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The evaluation criteria with quantitative and qualitative characteristics are determined through a literature survey and with the opinions of industrial experts. The process of calculating the weights of the evaluation criteria and choosing the most appropriate alternative is a decision-making process. Decision-making processes based on the opinions of decision-makers, real-life problems, and their complexity include perceptual differences and uncertainties. Hence, the classical MCDM methods have been extended to fuzzy sets in order to eliminate the uncertainty caused by this perception-based fuzziness. The weights of the evaluation criteria are calculated by fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. The most appropriate alternative is then selected using among candidate energy technologies with fuzzy VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method. Finally, a case study is conducted to validate the proposed model. To compare the results, the fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is utilized.","PeriodicalId":147960,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 The 9th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 The 9th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3386762.3391921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
With the increasing world population and industrial steps taken to meet consumption, the need for energy has increased. Today, the increasing demand for energy of the countries that consider their economic growth has increased their energy consumption. This has led to a global energy crisis. The rapid depletion of energy resources in the world has led countries to look for new resources. The necessity of sustainable energy has made renewable resources a new target. At this point, the selection of the best energy technology becomes important. Hence, this study aims to select the most appropriate sustainable energy technology with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The evaluation criteria with quantitative and qualitative characteristics are determined through a literature survey and with the opinions of industrial experts. The process of calculating the weights of the evaluation criteria and choosing the most appropriate alternative is a decision-making process. Decision-making processes based on the opinions of decision-makers, real-life problems, and their complexity include perceptual differences and uncertainties. Hence, the classical MCDM methods have been extended to fuzzy sets in order to eliminate the uncertainty caused by this perception-based fuzziness. The weights of the evaluation criteria are calculated by fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. The most appropriate alternative is then selected using among candidate energy technologies with fuzzy VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method. Finally, a case study is conducted to validate the proposed model. To compare the results, the fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is utilized.
随着世界人口的增加和为满足消费而采取的工业步骤,对能源的需求也增加了。今天,考虑经济增长的国家对能源的需求不断增加,增加了他们的能源消耗。这导致了全球能源危机。世界上能源资源的迅速枯竭促使各国寻找新的资源。可持续能源的必要性使可再生资源成为一个新的目标。在这一点上,选择最好的能源技术变得很重要。因此,本研究旨在采用多准则决策(MCDM)方法选择最合适的可持续能源技术。通过文献调查和行业专家的意见,确定了具有定量和定性特征的评价标准。计算评价标准的权重并选择最合适的备选方案的过程是一个决策过程。决策过程基于决策者的意见、现实问题及其复杂性,包括感知差异和不确定性。因此,经典的MCDM方法被扩展到模糊集,以消除这种基于感知的模糊性所带来的不确定性。采用模糊层次分析法计算各评价指标的权重。然后使用模糊VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje)方法从候选能源技术中选择最合适的替代方案。最后,通过实例分析验证了该模型的有效性。为了比较结果,采用了模糊TOPSIS (technical for Order Preference by Similarity To Ideal Solution)方法。