The Validity of Teaching Materials Oriented to Argument-Driven-Inquiry Model to Train Students’ Science Literacy

Faridatur Rofi'ah, T. Tukiran, E. Susantini
{"title":"The Validity of Teaching Materials Oriented to Argument-Driven-Inquiry Model to Train Students’ Science Literacy","authors":"Faridatur Rofi'ah, T. Tukiran, E. Susantini","doi":"10.2991/snk-19.2019.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research related to the development of teaching materials using the Argument-Driven-Inquiry model to train Students’ Science Literacy which seems not to have been done. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to produce a valid teaching materials. The developed teaching materials focused on the buffer solution matter. Teaching materials developed include lesson plan, student book, student worksheets, and science literacy tests. The Argument-Driven-Inquiry model referred to in developing teaching materials has eight steps, namely task identification; data collection and analysis; production of tentative arguments; argumentation session; compiling reports; double-blind group peer review; revised report; and explicit and reflective discussion. The science literacy trained in this study consists of six indicators. The study design used referred to the 4D Model. Data were obtained from the results of the experts' validation using a validation instrument and were subsequently analyzed using a Likert scale. Based on the assessment of experts, the materials developed have a very valid and reliable category. Thus, the materials can be ready to be used in learning with minor revision. Keywords—Validity, Teaching Material, Argument-DrivenInquiry, Science Literacy, Buffer Solution","PeriodicalId":256735,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research related to the development of teaching materials using the Argument-Driven-Inquiry model to train Students’ Science Literacy which seems not to have been done. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to produce a valid teaching materials. The developed teaching materials focused on the buffer solution matter. Teaching materials developed include lesson plan, student book, student worksheets, and science literacy tests. The Argument-Driven-Inquiry model referred to in developing teaching materials has eight steps, namely task identification; data collection and analysis; production of tentative arguments; argumentation session; compiling reports; double-blind group peer review; revised report; and explicit and reflective discussion. The science literacy trained in this study consists of six indicators. The study design used referred to the 4D Model. Data were obtained from the results of the experts' validation using a validation instrument and were subsequently analyzed using a Likert scale. Based on the assessment of experts, the materials developed have a very valid and reliable category. Thus, the materials can be ready to be used in learning with minor revision. Keywords—Validity, Teaching Material, Argument-DrivenInquiry, Science Literacy, Buffer Solution
论证驱动探究模式教材对培养学生科学素养的有效性
利用论证驱动型探究模式来培养学生科学素养的教材开发研究似乎还没有做过。因此,本研究的目的是制作有效的教材。开发的教材侧重于缓冲溶液问题。所开发的教学材料包括课程计划、学生用书、学生工作表和科学素养测试。教材开发中的论证驱动探究模式有八个步骤,即任务识别;数据收集和分析;试探性论证的产生;论证会议;编译报告;双盲组同行评议;修改后的报告;以及明确和反思的讨论。本研究培养的科学素养包括六个指标。采用的研究设计参照了4D模型。使用验证仪器从专家验证的结果中获得数据,随后使用李克特量表进行分析。根据专家的评估,所开发的材料具有非常有效和可靠的类别。因此,只要稍加修改,这些材料就可以在学习中使用。关键词:效度,教材,论证驱动型探究,科学素养,缓冲方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信