Conrad and the Erotic: “A Smile of Fortune” and “The Planter of Malata”

J. Hawthorn, Thomas C. Moser's, J. Conrad
{"title":"Conrad and the Erotic: “A Smile of Fortune” and “The Planter of Malata”","authors":"J. Hawthorn, Thomas C. Moser's, J. Conrad","doi":"10.1163/9789004490949_011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SINCE THOMAS C. MOSER'S Joseph Conrad: Achievement and Decline appeared in 1957, discussion of the sharply varying quality of Conrad's fiction and analysis of his depiction of relationships between men and women seem destined to overlap. Moser's diagnosis of what he con siders the debilitating sickness in Conrad's fiction is neither simple nor simplistic but involves a clear thesis: \"love\" is \"the lowest common denominator of the apprentice work ... of the inferior short novels ... of the weak portions of \"Heart of Darkness,\" Lord Jim, and Nostromo\" It also \"dominates the later period, where it is central to six of the seven novels\" (3-4). Moser concludes that the \"sympathetic treatment of love between a white man and a woman is not congenial to the early Conrad's creativity\" (65). In such summarizing statements Moser blames Conrad's attempt to write about love, not about sexuality, for inadequacies in the better work and for his \"decline.\" But his account of the relationship between love and sexuality in Conrad, between, say, the romantic and the erotic, is not always as clear as one might wish. Discussing \"The Return,\" for example, which he characterizes as \"a bad piece of writing,\" he writes that it provides a \"locus classicus for the near paralysis of Conrad's crea tivity when dealing with a sexual subject,\" and that \"it is significant that Conrad's one extended study of a sexual subject should center in an inadequate male who sees female sexuality as an inescapable menace\" (1957: 77). In contrast, he enthusiastically describes \"A Smile of Fortune\" as \"a first-rate story of female sexuality and male impotence\" (98). That critics still engage with Moser's thesis says something about its importance, but it has had unfortunate after-effects. Susan Jones's","PeriodicalId":438326,"journal":{"name":"Joseph Conrad","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joseph Conrad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004490949_011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SINCE THOMAS C. MOSER'S Joseph Conrad: Achievement and Decline appeared in 1957, discussion of the sharply varying quality of Conrad's fiction and analysis of his depiction of relationships between men and women seem destined to overlap. Moser's diagnosis of what he con siders the debilitating sickness in Conrad's fiction is neither simple nor simplistic but involves a clear thesis: "love" is "the lowest common denominator of the apprentice work ... of the inferior short novels ... of the weak portions of "Heart of Darkness," Lord Jim, and Nostromo" It also "dominates the later period, where it is central to six of the seven novels" (3-4). Moser concludes that the "sympathetic treatment of love between a white man and a woman is not congenial to the early Conrad's creativity" (65). In such summarizing statements Moser blames Conrad's attempt to write about love, not about sexuality, for inadequacies in the better work and for his "decline." But his account of the relationship between love and sexuality in Conrad, between, say, the romantic and the erotic, is not always as clear as one might wish. Discussing "The Return," for example, which he characterizes as "a bad piece of writing," he writes that it provides a "locus classicus for the near paralysis of Conrad's crea tivity when dealing with a sexual subject," and that "it is significant that Conrad's one extended study of a sexual subject should center in an inadequate male who sees female sexuality as an inescapable menace" (1957: 77). In contrast, he enthusiastically describes "A Smile of Fortune" as "a first-rate story of female sexuality and male impotence" (98). That critics still engage with Moser's thesis says something about its importance, but it has had unfortunate after-effects. Susan Jones's
康拉德与情色:《幸运的微笑》与《玛拉塔的种植园主》
自从托马斯·c·莫泽的《约瑟夫·康拉德:成就与衰落》于1957年出版以来,关于康拉德小说质量差异巨大的讨论,以及对他对男女关系描写的分析,似乎注定要重叠。莫泽对康拉德小说中令人衰弱的疾病的诊断既不简单也不过分简单化,而是包含了一个明确的论点:“爱”是“学徒工作的最低公分母……劣等短篇小说……在《黑暗之心》、《吉姆勋爵》和《诺斯特罗莫》的薄弱部分中,它也“主导了后期,在七部小说中有六部是中心”(3-4)。莫泽的结论是,“对白人男女之间爱情的同情处理与康拉德早期的创作不符”(65)。在这样的总结陈述中,莫泽指责康拉德试图写爱,而不是性,这是他在更好的作品中的不足之处,也是他的“衰落”。但他对康拉德作品中爱与性之间的关系,比如浪漫与情欲之间的关系的描述,并不总是像人们希望的那样清晰。例如,在讨论《归来》时,他将其描述为“一篇糟糕的作品”,他写道,它提供了“康拉德在处理性主题时近乎瘫痪的创造力的经典场所”,并且“康拉德对性主题的一次扩展研究应该集中在一个将女性性行为视为不可避免的威胁的不称职的男性身上,这是很重要的”(1957:77)。相反,他热情地将《幸运的微笑》描述为“一个关于女性性欲和男性无能的一流故事”(98)。批评人士仍在关注莫泽的理论,这说明了它的重要性,但它也产生了不幸的后果。苏珊·琼斯的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信