Christopher Cabrall, Lynne Martin, Paul U. Lee, Kimberly K. Jobe
{"title":"Exploration of human factors issues within a future separation assurance concept","authors":"Christopher Cabrall, Lynne Martin, Paul U. Lee, Kimberly K. Jobe","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2009.5347469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human factors (HF) impact of sweeping changes in the roles of human operators, as well as the introduction of new technologies, are being studied in NASA's Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). As part of a NASA funded project [1], a walkthrough technique was constructed to examine the effectiveness of using a low-cost method for looking at NextGen concepts in detail within a concrete operational context. A ground-based Separation Assurance (SA) concept was chosen as a specific example and its instantiation for a high-level en route air traffic controller position was selected as the focus. Test run recordings from a previous study [2] provided four off-nominal events as stimuli for our walkthrough. Each event was analyzed to identify its progression due to an action by the controller or the automation. Based on reviews of four NextGen research concepts [1, 3], 18 HF themes were selected as key areas affected by introducing NextGen automation for the SA function. These encompassed cognitive and organizational topics including attention, workload and job responsibilities. A walkthrough was constructed by applying these themes as questions to relevant points in a set of events. Six retired controllers watched each event three times. First, the event was played in real time; second, the event was stepped through and a question with a cognitive theme was asked; and third, the event was stepped through again and an organization question was asked. Participants' answers were recorded and later transcribed. Qualitative analyses selected questions that addressed the 18 themes. Results indicated valuable unique operational insights into the problems for the NextGen SA concept not previously available through human-in-the-loop simulations alone. Given that other concept exploration methods are resource-intensive (e.g. Human in the Loop), the cognitive walkthrough was found to be a low cost and reasonably rapid method for exploring HF issues. The use of a dynamic “storyboard” to provide the stimulus for the walkthrough questions, while moving away from the original cognitive walkthrough method, was considered to be essential in the domain due to the spatial and dynamic nature of controllers' expertise.","PeriodicalId":313168,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2009.5347469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The human factors (HF) impact of sweeping changes in the roles of human operators, as well as the introduction of new technologies, are being studied in NASA's Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). As part of a NASA funded project [1], a walkthrough technique was constructed to examine the effectiveness of using a low-cost method for looking at NextGen concepts in detail within a concrete operational context. A ground-based Separation Assurance (SA) concept was chosen as a specific example and its instantiation for a high-level en route air traffic controller position was selected as the focus. Test run recordings from a previous study [2] provided four off-nominal events as stimuli for our walkthrough. Each event was analyzed to identify its progression due to an action by the controller or the automation. Based on reviews of four NextGen research concepts [1, 3], 18 HF themes were selected as key areas affected by introducing NextGen automation for the SA function. These encompassed cognitive and organizational topics including attention, workload and job responsibilities. A walkthrough was constructed by applying these themes as questions to relevant points in a set of events. Six retired controllers watched each event three times. First, the event was played in real time; second, the event was stepped through and a question with a cognitive theme was asked; and third, the event was stepped through again and an organization question was asked. Participants' answers were recorded and later transcribed. Qualitative analyses selected questions that addressed the 18 themes. Results indicated valuable unique operational insights into the problems for the NextGen SA concept not previously available through human-in-the-loop simulations alone. Given that other concept exploration methods are resource-intensive (e.g. Human in the Loop), the cognitive walkthrough was found to be a low cost and reasonably rapid method for exploring HF issues. The use of a dynamic “storyboard” to provide the stimulus for the walkthrough questions, while moving away from the original cognitive walkthrough method, was considered to be essential in the domain due to the spatial and dynamic nature of controllers' expertise.
NASA的下一代航空运输系统(NextGen)正在研究人为因素(HF)对人类操作员角色的全面变化以及新技术的引入的影响。作为NASA资助项目[1]的一部分,构建了一种演练技术,以检查在具体操作环境中使用低成本方法详细查看NextGen概念的有效性。以地面分离保障(SA)概念为具体实例,并以高空空中交通管制员岗位为重点进行实例化。先前研究[2]中的测试运行记录为我们的演练提供了四个非标称事件作为刺激。对每个事件进行分析,以确定由于控制器或自动化操作而导致的进程。基于对四个NextGen研究概念的回顾[1,3],选择了18个HF主题作为引入NextGen自动化对SA功能影响的关键领域。这些包括认知和组织主题,包括注意力、工作量和工作职责。演练是通过将这些主题作为问题应用于一组事件中的相关点来构建的。六名退休的管制员观看了每个事件三次。首先,事件是实时进行的;其次,对事件进行逐级筛选,提出一个认知主题的问题;第三,这个活动再次进行了一遍,并提出了一个组织问题。参与者的回答被记录下来,然后转录出来。定性分析选择了涉及18个主题的问题。结果表明,对于NextGen SA概念中存在的问题,有价值的独特操作见解,这是以前仅通过人在环模拟无法获得的。考虑到其他概念探索方法是资源密集型的(例如Human in the Loop),认知演练被认为是一种低成本且相当快速的探索高频问题的方法。使用动态“故事板”为演练问题提供刺激,同时远离最初的认知演练方法,由于控制器专业知识的空间和动态性质,这被认为是在该领域必不可少的。