An empirical examination of competing theories to explain continuous disclosure technology adoption intentions using XBRL as the example technology

R. Pinsker
{"title":"An empirical examination of competing theories to explain continuous disclosure technology adoption intentions using XBRL as the example technology","authors":"R. Pinsker","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-V8_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to test competing theories from Pinsker�s (2007) new\nresearch framework in order to provide a better understanding of XBRL (as the continuous\ndisclosure technology example) adoption intentions of managers who have low knowledge of\nXBRL, but work for firms who may adopt. A survey methodology was used with experienced\nbusiness professionals and MBA students. Two of three research propositions were empirically\nsupported. The results indicate that both the technology acceptance model (TAM) and absorptive\ncapacity represent appropriate theories for studying XBRL adoption. However, future related\nTAM research should be conducted either with a modified �attitude� variable or through\neliminating this variable altogether.\nResults provide an empirical validation of part of Pinsker�s (2007) framework. The findings\nadd to the existing practical and academic literature regarding perceived benefits of XBRL\nadoption for firms. The difference in significance between TAM variables represents a unique\nfinding in the TAM literature, which suggests XBRL adoption has significantly different aspects\nthan previous information technology adoption research in general. Future research opportunities\nare explored.","PeriodicalId":404481,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-V8_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to test competing theories from Pinsker�s (2007) new research framework in order to provide a better understanding of XBRL (as the continuous disclosure technology example) adoption intentions of managers who have low knowledge of XBRL, but work for firms who may adopt. A survey methodology was used with experienced business professionals and MBA students. Two of three research propositions were empirically supported. The results indicate that both the technology acceptance model (TAM) and absorptive capacity represent appropriate theories for studying XBRL adoption. However, future related TAM research should be conducted either with a modified �attitude� variable or through eliminating this variable altogether. Results provide an empirical validation of part of Pinsker�s (2007) framework. The findings add to the existing practical and academic literature regarding perceived benefits of XBRL adoption for firms. The difference in significance between TAM variables represents a unique finding in the TAM literature, which suggests XBRL adoption has significantly different aspects than previous information technology adoption research in general. Future research opportunities are explored.
以XBRL为例,对解释持续披露技术采用意向的竞争理论进行实证检验
本文的目的是检验Pinsker(2007)的新研究框架中的竞争理论,以便更好地理解对XBRL知之甚少但为可能采用XBRL的公司工作的管理者采用XBRL的意图(作为持续披露技术的例子)。对经验丰富的商业专业人士和MBA学生采用了一种调查方法。三个研究命题中有两个得到了实证支持。结果表明,技术接受模型(TAM)和吸收能力都是研究XBRL采用的合适理论。然而,未来的相关tam研究应该通过修改“态度”变量或通过完全消除这个变量来进行。结果提供了部分Pinsker(2007)框架的实证验证。这些发现为现有的实践和学术文献提供了关于企业采用xbrl的感知利益的补充。TAM变量之间的显著性差异代表了TAM文献中一个独特的发现,这表明XBRL的采用与以往一般的信息技术采用研究有显著不同。探讨了未来的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信