Capital Structure and Security Issuance Under Heterogeneous Beliefs

Thomas J. Chemmanur, Jean-Sébastien Michel, Debarshi K. Nandy, An Yan
{"title":"Capital Structure and Security Issuance Under Heterogeneous Beliefs","authors":"Thomas J. Chemmanur, Jean-Sébastien Michel, Debarshi K. Nandy, An Yan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.965923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a sample of debt and seasoned equity issues from 1980-2004 and different proxies of investor optimism and the dispersion in investor beliefs, we empirically analyze, for the first time in the literature, the effect of heterogeneous beliefs among outside investors on the capital structure and security issuance choices made by a firm. The paper consists of three parts: In the first part of the paper, we study how heterogeneous beliefs affect a firm's choice between equity and debt for raising external financing; in the second part of the paper, we study the effect of heterogeneous beliefs on the price impact of a security issue on the firm's equity; and in the third part of the paper, we study the effect of heterogeneous beliefs on the long-term stock performance of equity and debt issuers. Our empirical results can be summarized as follows. First, the probability of a firm issuing equity rather than debt is increasing in both the average level of optimism of outside investors and the dispersion in outsider beliefs. Second, the price impact on the firm's equity is negative for an equity issue and zero for a debt issue; further, the price impact of an equity issue is decreasing (more negative) as the dispersion in outsider beliefs is greater. Finally, while the long-term stock returns to both equity and debt issuers is negative, the stock returns to equity issuers is significantly more negative than that of debt issuers. Further, the more optimistic outsiders are on average about a firm's prospects at the time of an equity issue and the more dispersed their beliefs, the more negative the long-term stock returns to the firm. Overall, our results indicate the importance of heterogeneity in investor beliefs as a determinant of the financing decision of a firm.","PeriodicalId":334541,"journal":{"name":"Financing and Capital Allocation","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financing and Capital Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Using a sample of debt and seasoned equity issues from 1980-2004 and different proxies of investor optimism and the dispersion in investor beliefs, we empirically analyze, for the first time in the literature, the effect of heterogeneous beliefs among outside investors on the capital structure and security issuance choices made by a firm. The paper consists of three parts: In the first part of the paper, we study how heterogeneous beliefs affect a firm's choice between equity and debt for raising external financing; in the second part of the paper, we study the effect of heterogeneous beliefs on the price impact of a security issue on the firm's equity; and in the third part of the paper, we study the effect of heterogeneous beliefs on the long-term stock performance of equity and debt issuers. Our empirical results can be summarized as follows. First, the probability of a firm issuing equity rather than debt is increasing in both the average level of optimism of outside investors and the dispersion in outsider beliefs. Second, the price impact on the firm's equity is negative for an equity issue and zero for a debt issue; further, the price impact of an equity issue is decreasing (more negative) as the dispersion in outsider beliefs is greater. Finally, while the long-term stock returns to both equity and debt issuers is negative, the stock returns to equity issuers is significantly more negative than that of debt issuers. Further, the more optimistic outsiders are on average about a firm's prospects at the time of an equity issue and the more dispersed their beliefs, the more negative the long-term stock returns to the firm. Overall, our results indicate the importance of heterogeneity in investor beliefs as a determinant of the financing decision of a firm.
异质信念下的资本结构与证券发行
本文以1980-2004年的债券和股本发行为样本,利用投资者乐观情绪和投资者信念分散的不同代理,首次实证分析了外部投资者异质信念对企业资本结构和证券发行选择的影响。全文共分为三个部分:第一部分研究了异质信念对企业股权与债务融资选择的影响;本文的第二部分研究了异质信念对证券发行对公司权益的价格影响的影响;在本文的第三部分,我们研究了异质信念对股权和债券发行人长期股票绩效的影响。我们的实证结果可以总结如下。首先,公司发行股票而不是债券的可能性在外部投资者的平均乐观程度和外部信念的分散程度上都在增加。其次,对于股票发行,价格对公司权益的影响为负,而对于债务发行,价格对公司权益的影响为零;此外,股票发行对价格的影响正在减少(更负面),因为外部信念的分散性更大。最后,虽然股权发行人和债券发行人的长期股票收益均为负,但股权发行人的股票收益明显大于债券发行人的股票收益。此外,在股票发行时,局外人对公司前景的平均乐观程度越高,他们的信念越分散,公司的长期股票回报就越负。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,投资者信念的异质性作为企业融资决策的决定因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信