Comparison of Early Outcomes and Costs Between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy for Mild and Moderate Cases of Cholelithiasis in Rural Morocco: A Retrospective Comparative Study

M. Majbar, A. Benkabbou, A. Souadka
{"title":"Comparison of Early Outcomes and Costs Between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy for Mild and Moderate Cases of Cholelithiasis in Rural Morocco: A Retrospective Comparative Study","authors":"M. Majbar, A. Benkabbou, A. Souadka","doi":"10.17795/MINSURGERY-34182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was first introduced in the late 80’s, replacing open cholecystectomy as the standard surgical approach for cholelithiasis in developed countries. In contrast, there were initially many controversies in developing countries regarding the laparoscopic techniques. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the early outcomes and costs between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis in a rural hospital in a developing country. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for mild and moderate symptomatic gallstone, in the Marche Verte hospital, in the Boulemane province in Morocco between January and December 2011. Demographics, postoperative outcomes, and costs were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Duration of hospital stay was calculated from the time of operation to the time of discharge. The total costs for each patient included the sum of: the average hospitalization costs per day; the average operating room costs; and material and medications costs. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and student or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparison, as appropriate. Results: During the study period, 95 patients were included; among them, 53 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 42 laparotomy. There were no statistical differences between the two groups concerning age, gender distribution, American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and number of acute cholecystitis. Rate of conversion to open surgery was 5.6% (3 patients). Patients in the laparoscopic group had shorter hospital stay (2.9 vs. 4.7 days, P = 0.0001), lower rates of infectious complications (3.7% vs. 16.6%, P = 0.04), and lower costs (169 vs. 231.62 US dollars, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: The results of the present study showed that, in a rural hospital setting in a developing country, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis was associated with shorter hospital stay, less infectious morbidity rates, and reduced costs, compared to open surgery. Thus, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be advised as a routine technique for management of cholelithiasis in rural areas of developing countries.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/MINSURGERY-34182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was first introduced in the late 80’s, replacing open cholecystectomy as the standard surgical approach for cholelithiasis in developed countries. In contrast, there were initially many controversies in developing countries regarding the laparoscopic techniques. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the early outcomes and costs between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis in a rural hospital in a developing country. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for mild and moderate symptomatic gallstone, in the Marche Verte hospital, in the Boulemane province in Morocco between January and December 2011. Demographics, postoperative outcomes, and costs were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Duration of hospital stay was calculated from the time of operation to the time of discharge. The total costs for each patient included the sum of: the average hospitalization costs per day; the average operating room costs; and material and medications costs. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and student or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparison, as appropriate. Results: During the study period, 95 patients were included; among them, 53 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 42 laparotomy. There were no statistical differences between the two groups concerning age, gender distribution, American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and number of acute cholecystitis. Rate of conversion to open surgery was 5.6% (3 patients). Patients in the laparoscopic group had shorter hospital stay (2.9 vs. 4.7 days, P = 0.0001), lower rates of infectious complications (3.7% vs. 16.6%, P = 0.04), and lower costs (169 vs. 231.62 US dollars, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: The results of the present study showed that, in a rural hospital setting in a developing country, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis was associated with shorter hospital stay, less infectious morbidity rates, and reduced costs, compared to open surgery. Thus, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be advised as a routine technique for management of cholelithiasis in rural areas of developing countries.
摩洛哥农村轻中度胆石症的腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的早期疗效和费用比较:一项回顾性比较研究
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)于80年代末首次引入,在发达国家取代开腹胆囊切除术成为胆石症的标准手术方式。相比之下,发展中国家最初对腹腔镜技术存在许多争议。目的:本研究旨在比较发展中国家农村医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆石症的早期结果和成本。患者和方法:这项回顾性研究包括2011年1月至12月在摩洛哥Boulemane省Marche Verte医院因轻度和中度症状性胆结石接受胆囊切除术的所有连续患者。比较腹腔镜组和开放手术组的人口统计学、术后结果和费用。住院时间从手术时间到出院时间计算。每名患者的总费用包括:平均每日住院费用;平均手术室费用;还有材料和药物费用。适当时使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验和学生检验或Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。结果:研究期间共纳入95例患者;其中腹腔镜手术53例,开腹手术42例。两组患者在年龄、性别分布、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分类、急性胆囊炎发病数量等方面均无统计学差异。转开手术率为5.6%(3例)。腹腔镜组患者住院时间较短(2.9天对4.7天,P = 0.0001),感染并发症发生率较低(3.7%对16.6%,P = 0.04),费用较低(169美元对231.62美元,P = 0.0001)。结论:本研究结果表明,在发展中国家的农村医院环境中,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗症状性胆结石的住院时间更短,感染发病率更低,成本更低。因此,在发展中国家的农村地区,应建议将腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为治疗胆石症的常规技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信