The Selection Problem

Francesco Berto
{"title":"The Selection Problem","authors":"Francesco Berto","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv14164s1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Fiction and Fictionalism, Mark Sainsbury has recently dubbed “Selection Problem” a serious trouble for Meinongian object theories. Typically, Meinongianism has been phrased as a kind of realism on nonexistent objects : these are mind-independent things, not mental simulacra, having the properties they have independently from the activity of any cognitive agent. But how can one single out an object we have no causal acquaintance with, and which is devoid of spatiotemporal location, picking it out from a pre-determined, mind-independent set ?In this paper, I set out a line of response by distinguishing different ways in which a thing may not exist. I show that the selection problem (a) does not arise for past, currently nonexistent objects ; (b) may not arise also for future existents (provided one massages naive intuitions a bit) ; and (c) even for mere possibilia ; but (d) is a real snag for purely fictional objects, such as Holmes or Gandalf. As for (d), I propose a solution that forces Meinongianism to introduce a kind of ontological dependence of purely fictional nonexistents upon existents. The strategy complicates the intuitively simple, naive Meinongian framework a bit, but looks quite promising.","PeriodicalId":171306,"journal":{"name":"Social Choice with Partial Knowledge of Treatment Response","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Choice with Partial Knowledge of Treatment Response","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14164s1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Fiction and Fictionalism, Mark Sainsbury has recently dubbed “Selection Problem” a serious trouble for Meinongian object theories. Typically, Meinongianism has been phrased as a kind of realism on nonexistent objects : these are mind-independent things, not mental simulacra, having the properties they have independently from the activity of any cognitive agent. But how can one single out an object we have no causal acquaintance with, and which is devoid of spatiotemporal location, picking it out from a pre-determined, mind-independent set ?In this paper, I set out a line of response by distinguishing different ways in which a thing may not exist. I show that the selection problem (a) does not arise for past, currently nonexistent objects ; (b) may not arise also for future existents (provided one massages naive intuitions a bit) ; and (c) even for mere possibilia ; but (d) is a real snag for purely fictional objects, such as Holmes or Gandalf. As for (d), I propose a solution that forces Meinongianism to introduce a kind of ontological dependence of purely fictional nonexistents upon existents. The strategy complicates the intuitively simple, naive Meinongian framework a bit, but looks quite promising.
选择问题
在《小说与虚构主义》一书中,马克·塞恩斯伯里最近将“选择问题”称为迈农主义客体理论的一个严重问题。典型地,迈农主义被描述为一种对不存在的事物的现实主义:这些是独立于思维的事物,而不是精神的拟像,具有独立于任何认知主体活动的特性。但是,一个人怎么能从一个事先确定的、独立于思维的集合中挑出一个我们没有因果关系的、没有时空位置的物体呢?在这篇论文中,我通过区分一个事物可能不存在的不同方式,列出了一系列反应。我表明,选择问题(a)不会出现在过去,目前不存在的对象;(b)可能不会出现在未来的存在(只要一个人稍微按摩天真的直觉);(c)甚至仅仅是可能性;但(d)对于纯粹虚构的人物来说是一个真正的障碍,比如福尔摩斯或甘道夫。至于(d),我提出了一个解决方案,迫使迈农主义引入一种纯粹虚构的不存在对存在的本体论依赖。该策略使直观上简单、朴素的Meinongian框架变得复杂了一些,但看起来很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信