The Fair Housing Act Case That Never Was

Anthony W. Cresap
{"title":"The Fair Housing Act Case That Never Was","authors":"Anthony W. Cresap","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Buckeye decision will undoubtedly be a necessary reference for the practitioner confronting a referendum proposed by citizens opposed to an affordable housing facility. But Buckeye is a constitutional law case, not a Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) one. Many of us were looking forward to a new U.S. Supreme Court FHA decision. The Buckeye developer did not prosecute an FHA intentional discrimination claim and, as noted, abandoned its FHA claim about disparate impact (discriminatory effect).","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Buckeye decision will undoubtedly be a necessary reference for the practitioner confronting a referendum proposed by citizens opposed to an affordable housing facility. But Buckeye is a constitutional law case, not a Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) one. Many of us were looking forward to a new U.S. Supreme Court FHA decision. The Buckeye developer did not prosecute an FHA intentional discrimination claim and, as noted, abandoned its FHA claim about disparate impact (discriminatory effect).
从未有过的公平住房法案案
七叶树的决定无疑将是一个必要的参考从业者面对公民提出反对经济适用房设施的公投。但七叶树案是一个宪法案件,而不是一个公平住房法案(FHA)案件。我们中的许多人都期待着美国最高法院对联邦住房管理局做出新的裁决。七叶树开发商没有起诉联邦住房管理局的故意歧视索赔,并且,如上所述,放弃了联邦住房管理局关于差别影响(歧视效应)的索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信