Design and Application Evaluation of Revolutionary Inflow Control Devices Enhanced Bitumen Recovery and Thermal Efficiency in SAGD Process

Guangyue Liang, Qian Xie, Y. Liu, Shangqi Liu, Jiuning Zhou, Yu Bao
{"title":"Design and Application Evaluation of Revolutionary Inflow Control Devices Enhanced Bitumen Recovery and Thermal Efficiency in SAGD Process","authors":"Guangyue Liang, Qian Xie, Y. Liu, Shangqi Liu, Jiuning Zhou, Yu Bao","doi":"10.2118/209682-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Non-uniform steam chamber caused by reservoir heterogeneity, shale interlayer, local mobile water, undulating well trajectories and improper operation, etc., severely restricts oil sands SAGD performance. Inflow control devices (ICD) achieved great success in controlling conventional water or gas coning. Inspired by this, liner and then retrofitting tubing deployed ICD have been tested since 2009 and soared in recent years. Therefore, this paper made a systematic review of ICD design, operation principle and application evaluation.\n Different types of ICD applications in dozens of Canadian oil sands projects were comparatively investigated including operating principle, adaptability analysis, liner-deployed or tubing-deployed ICD, early-to-medium SAGD performance. Then a numerical simulation method incorporated the relationship of pressure drop versus mass rate at different conditions and pressure degradation due to erosion impacts is presented. The feasibility analysis of ICD deployed on injector or producer was further evaluated by numerical simulations. Besides, a set of ICD optimization design method is provided including the principles of well selection, reasonable ICD number along horizontal well section, and optimum operating conditions, etc.\n Revolutionary ICD technology has become an effective way of greatly improving SAGD performance in recent years. According to the statistical data, most ICD are deployed on producers rather than injectors, which is also explained by numerical simulations of technical feasibility evaluation. In order to deal with uneven steam chamber growth, the number of tubing deployed ICD dramatically increases in recent years. The proportion of liner and tubing deployed ICD is 58% and 42%, respectively. However, there are big differences in SAGD performance of different ICD wells. Some ICD wells is worse in SAGD performance and even damaged by sand production. Based on absorbing the knowledge of field application, the behavior of different types of ICD was compared to guide the selection. Then the workflow of ICD optimization design method was provided by calculating conformance and allocated liquid volume according to the relationship of pressure drop versus mass rate. The operation principle is suggested to facilitate lower subcool but zero subcool not allowed in long term due to sand production risk. On the basis of reasonable well selection, it can easily improve conformance by above 15% and oil production by over 50%. Inspired by this, ICD also applied to several multilateral SAGD well pairs to balance steam or liquid distribution along horizontal wellbore.\n This paper first systematically provides various types of ICD behavior, screening criteria, design practices, operation principle and application evaluation in SAGD process. These findings are very useful for ICD design and enhancing both oil recovery and thermal efficiency in heavy oil or bitumen production.","PeriodicalId":332644,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 07, 2022","volume":"12 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 07, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209682-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Non-uniform steam chamber caused by reservoir heterogeneity, shale interlayer, local mobile water, undulating well trajectories and improper operation, etc., severely restricts oil sands SAGD performance. Inflow control devices (ICD) achieved great success in controlling conventional water or gas coning. Inspired by this, liner and then retrofitting tubing deployed ICD have been tested since 2009 and soared in recent years. Therefore, this paper made a systematic review of ICD design, operation principle and application evaluation. Different types of ICD applications in dozens of Canadian oil sands projects were comparatively investigated including operating principle, adaptability analysis, liner-deployed or tubing-deployed ICD, early-to-medium SAGD performance. Then a numerical simulation method incorporated the relationship of pressure drop versus mass rate at different conditions and pressure degradation due to erosion impacts is presented. The feasibility analysis of ICD deployed on injector or producer was further evaluated by numerical simulations. Besides, a set of ICD optimization design method is provided including the principles of well selection, reasonable ICD number along horizontal well section, and optimum operating conditions, etc. Revolutionary ICD technology has become an effective way of greatly improving SAGD performance in recent years. According to the statistical data, most ICD are deployed on producers rather than injectors, which is also explained by numerical simulations of technical feasibility evaluation. In order to deal with uneven steam chamber growth, the number of tubing deployed ICD dramatically increases in recent years. The proportion of liner and tubing deployed ICD is 58% and 42%, respectively. However, there are big differences in SAGD performance of different ICD wells. Some ICD wells is worse in SAGD performance and even damaged by sand production. Based on absorbing the knowledge of field application, the behavior of different types of ICD was compared to guide the selection. Then the workflow of ICD optimization design method was provided by calculating conformance and allocated liquid volume according to the relationship of pressure drop versus mass rate. The operation principle is suggested to facilitate lower subcool but zero subcool not allowed in long term due to sand production risk. On the basis of reasonable well selection, it can easily improve conformance by above 15% and oil production by over 50%. Inspired by this, ICD also applied to several multilateral SAGD well pairs to balance steam or liquid distribution along horizontal wellbore. This paper first systematically provides various types of ICD behavior, screening criteria, design practices, operation principle and application evaluation in SAGD process. These findings are very useful for ICD design and enhancing both oil recovery and thermal efficiency in heavy oil or bitumen production.
提高SAGD工艺沥青采收率和热效率的新型流入控制装置设计与应用评价
储层非均质性、页岩夹层、局部流动水、井眼轨迹波动、操作不当等因素导致的蒸汽室不均匀,严重制约了油砂SAGD性能。流入控制装置(ICD)在控制常规水或气进流方面取得了巨大成功。受此启发,自2009年以来,尾管和安装ICD的改造油管进行了测试,近年来数量激增。因此,本文对ICD的设计、工作原理和应用评价进行了系统的综述。对比研究了不同类型的ICD在加拿大数十个油砂项目中的应用,包括工作原理、适应性分析、尾管部署或管下部署ICD、早期至中期SAGD性能。在此基础上,提出了一种考虑不同条件下压降与质量速率关系以及侵蚀影响下压力退化的数值模拟方法。通过数值模拟进一步评价了ICD部署在注入器或采油器上的可行性。提出了一套ICD优化设计方法,包括选井原则、合理的水平段ICD数量、最佳工况等。近年来,革命性的ICD技术已成为大大提高SAGD性能的有效途径。根据统计数据,大多数ICD都部署在生产商而不是注入器上,这也可以通过技术可行性评估的数值模拟来解释。为了解决蒸汽室增长不均匀的问题,近年来安装ICD的油管数量急剧增加。尾管和油管安装ICD的比例分别为58%和42%。然而,不同ICD井的SAGD性能差异较大。一些ICD井的SAGD性能较差,甚至因出砂而受损。在吸收现场应用知识的基础上,比较了不同类型ICD的性能,指导选型。然后根据压降与质量率的关系,通过计算一致性和分配液量,给出了ICD优化设计方法的工作流程。建议的操作原则是降低过冷度,但由于出砂风险,不允许长期使用零过冷度。在合理选井的基础上,可轻松提高井眼一致性15%以上,提高产油量50%以上。受此启发,ICD也应用于几口多分支SAGD井对,以平衡水平井筒中的蒸汽或液体分布。本文首先系统地介绍了SAGD过程中各类ICD的行为、筛选标准、设计实践、工作原理和应用评价。这些发现对ICD设计非常有用,可以提高稠油或沥青生产中的采收率和热效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信