Who Pays in Pay for Performance? Evidence from Hospital Pricing

Michael E Darden, Ian M. McCarthy, E. Barrette
{"title":"Who Pays in Pay for Performance? Evidence from Hospital Pricing","authors":"Michael E Darden, Ian M. McCarthy, E. Barrette","doi":"10.3386/W24304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), two components of the Affordable Care Act's cost containment measures, introduced potentially sizeable penalties to underperforming hospitals across a variety of metrics. To the extent that penalized hospitals subsequently changed their processes of care, such changes may translate into higher payments from commercial insurance patients. In this paper, we estimate the effects of these pay-for-performance programs on private hospital payments using data on commercial insurance payments from a large, multi-payer database. We find that nearly 70% of the costs of the HRRP and HVBP penalties are borne by private insurance patients in the form of higher private insurance payments to hospitals. Specifically, we show that HRRP and HVBP led to increases in private payments of 1.4%, or approximately $183,700 per hospital based on an average relative penalty of $271,000. We find very limited evidence that these effects are driven by quality improvements, changes in treatment intensity, or changes in service mix.","PeriodicalId":309156,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Health Care Delivery (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Health Care Delivery (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W24304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), two components of the Affordable Care Act's cost containment measures, introduced potentially sizeable penalties to underperforming hospitals across a variety of metrics. To the extent that penalized hospitals subsequently changed their processes of care, such changes may translate into higher payments from commercial insurance patients. In this paper, we estimate the effects of these pay-for-performance programs on private hospital payments using data on commercial insurance payments from a large, multi-payer database. We find that nearly 70% of the costs of the HRRP and HVBP penalties are borne by private insurance patients in the form of higher private insurance payments to hospitals. Specifically, we show that HRRP and HVBP led to increases in private payments of 1.4%, or approximately $183,700 per hospital based on an average relative penalty of $271,000. We find very limited evidence that these effects are driven by quality improvements, changes in treatment intensity, or changes in service mix.
谁来支付绩效工资?来自医院定价的证据
医院再入院减少计划(HRRP)和医院基于价值的采购计划(HVBP)是《平价医疗法案》成本控制措施的两个组成部分,在各种指标上对表现不佳的医院实施了可能相当大的处罚。在某种程度上,受处罚的医院随后改变了其护理流程,这种变化可能转化为商业保险患者支付的更高费用。在本文中,我们使用来自大型多付款人数据库的商业保险支付数据来估计这些按绩效付费计划对私立医院支付的影响。我们发现,近70%的HRRP和HVBP罚款费用是由私人保险患者以更高的私人保险支付给医院的形式承担的。具体而言,我们表明,HRRP和HVBP导致私人支付增加1.4%,或根据平均相对罚款271,000美元计算,每家医院约增加183,700美元。我们发现非常有限的证据表明,这些影响是由质量改进、治疗强度的变化或服务组合的变化驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信