Citizen Science and Sustainability Transitions

Henry Sauermann, K. Vohland, Vyron Antoniou, B. Balázs, C. Göbel, K. Karatzas, P. Mooney, J. Perelló, Marisa Ponti, R. Samson, S. Winter
{"title":"Citizen Science and Sustainability Transitions","authors":"Henry Sauermann, K. Vohland, Vyron Antoniou, B. Balázs, C. Göbel, K. Karatzas, P. Mooney, J. Perelló, Marisa Ponti, R. Samson, S. Winter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3511088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Citizen Science (CS) projects involve members of the general public as active participants in research. While some advocates hope that CS can increase scientific knowledge production (“productivity view”), others emphasize that it may bridge a perceived gap between science and the broader society (“democratization view”). We discuss how an integration of both views can allow Citizen Science to support complex sustainability transitions in areas such as renewable energy, public health, or environmental conservation. We first identify three pathways through which such impacts can occur: (1) Problem identification and agenda setting; (2) Resource mobilization; and (3) Facilitating socio-technical co-evolution. To realize this potential, however, CS needs to address important challenges that emerge especially in the context of sustainability transitions: Increasing the diversity, level, and intensity of participation; addressing the social as well as technical nature of sustainability problems; and reducing tensions between CS and the traditional institution of academic science. Grounded in a review of academic literature and policy reports as well as a broad range of case examples, this article contributes to scholarship on science, innovation, and sustainability transitions. We also offer insights for actors involved in initiating or institutionalizing Citizen Science efforts, including project organizers, funding agencies, and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":283851,"journal":{"name":"EcoRN: Citizen Science (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EcoRN: Citizen Science (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

Abstract Citizen Science (CS) projects involve members of the general public as active participants in research. While some advocates hope that CS can increase scientific knowledge production (“productivity view”), others emphasize that it may bridge a perceived gap between science and the broader society (“democratization view”). We discuss how an integration of both views can allow Citizen Science to support complex sustainability transitions in areas such as renewable energy, public health, or environmental conservation. We first identify three pathways through which such impacts can occur: (1) Problem identification and agenda setting; (2) Resource mobilization; and (3) Facilitating socio-technical co-evolution. To realize this potential, however, CS needs to address important challenges that emerge especially in the context of sustainability transitions: Increasing the diversity, level, and intensity of participation; addressing the social as well as technical nature of sustainability problems; and reducing tensions between CS and the traditional institution of academic science. Grounded in a review of academic literature and policy reports as well as a broad range of case examples, this article contributes to scholarship on science, innovation, and sustainability transitions. We also offer insights for actors involved in initiating or institutionalizing Citizen Science efforts, including project organizers, funding agencies, and policy makers.
公民科学与可持续转型
摘要公民科学(CS)项目需要普通公众作为研究的积极参与者。一些支持者希望计算机科学可以增加科学知识的生产(“生产力观点”),另一些人则强调它可以弥合科学与更广泛的社会之间的差距(“民主化观点”)。我们讨论了两种观点的整合如何允许公民科学在可再生能源、公共卫生或环境保护等领域支持复杂的可持续性转型。我们首先确定了产生这种影响的三个途径:(1)问题识别和议程设置;(2)资源调动;(3)促进社会技术共同进化。然而,要实现这一潜力,计算机科学需要解决特别是在可持续性转型背景下出现的重要挑战:增加参与的多样性、水平和强度;处理可持续性问题的社会和技术性质;并减少计算机科学与传统学术科学机构之间的紧张关系。本文基于对学术文献和政策报告的回顾以及广泛的案例示例,为科学、创新和可持续转型方面的学术研究做出了贡献。我们还为参与启动或制度化公民科学工作的参与者提供见解,包括项目组织者、资助机构和政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信