Dermoscopic, clinical, and histopathological aspects of leprosy and lepra reaction cases: An observational cross-sectional study

Rashmiben Agharia, Hitarth N. Mehta, Ankit H. Bharti, Manal D. Dave, V. Patel
{"title":"Dermoscopic, clinical, and histopathological aspects of leprosy and lepra reaction cases: An observational cross-sectional study","authors":"Rashmiben Agharia, Hitarth N. Mehta, Ankit H. Bharti, Manal D. Dave, V. Patel","doi":"10.4103/ijdpdd.ijdpdd_3_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Owing to myriad clinical presentations in leprosy, it becomes a diagnostic challenge. Dermoscopy visualizes skin structures not normally visible to the naked eye, providing additional morphological information. Aims: The aim of this work was to study and evaluate the various dermoscopic patterns of different types of leprosy and lepra reactions and to assess their association with clinical and histopathology. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken at dermatology OPD over 1.5 years after ethical approval. Thorough clinical, physical, local examination, and gross photographs were taken. Dermoscopy was taken and the images were analyzed for dermoscopic features. Biopsy from the same lesion was taken. Results: A total of 50 naïve cases of leprosy and lepra reactions with skin phototypes of IV to VI were studied. Males (30) outnumbered females (20). The most common type was Borderline tuberculoid Leprosy (BT) (21,42%). We observed yellowish-brown and white structureless areas histologically corresponding to dermal granulomatous infiltrate, whereas vascular findings predominantly of linear irregular vessels and variable loss of appendageal structures histologically corresponding to perivascular and periappendageal infiltrate respectively were predominant features throughout the spectrum. Appendageal structures were markedly reduced in the tuberculoid pole. We noted reduced pigmentary network towards tuberculoid pole whereas accentuation towards the lepromatous pole. Follicular plugging, scaling, and shiny white areas were additional features in the lepra reaction. Conclusion: Yellowish brown and white structureless areas, associated vascular findings predominantly of linear irregular vessels, and variable loss of appendageal structures were key features throughout the spectrum. Sunflower-like appearance, rosette-like pattern and milky red background in histoid leprosy, target-like pattern in type 2 lepra reaction were the unique dermoscopic findings from our study.","PeriodicalId":423971,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatopathology and Diagnostic Dermatology","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatopathology and Diagnostic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdpdd.ijdpdd_3_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Owing to myriad clinical presentations in leprosy, it becomes a diagnostic challenge. Dermoscopy visualizes skin structures not normally visible to the naked eye, providing additional morphological information. Aims: The aim of this work was to study and evaluate the various dermoscopic patterns of different types of leprosy and lepra reactions and to assess their association with clinical and histopathology. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken at dermatology OPD over 1.5 years after ethical approval. Thorough clinical, physical, local examination, and gross photographs were taken. Dermoscopy was taken and the images were analyzed for dermoscopic features. Biopsy from the same lesion was taken. Results: A total of 50 naïve cases of leprosy and lepra reactions with skin phototypes of IV to VI were studied. Males (30) outnumbered females (20). The most common type was Borderline tuberculoid Leprosy (BT) (21,42%). We observed yellowish-brown and white structureless areas histologically corresponding to dermal granulomatous infiltrate, whereas vascular findings predominantly of linear irregular vessels and variable loss of appendageal structures histologically corresponding to perivascular and periappendageal infiltrate respectively were predominant features throughout the spectrum. Appendageal structures were markedly reduced in the tuberculoid pole. We noted reduced pigmentary network towards tuberculoid pole whereas accentuation towards the lepromatous pole. Follicular plugging, scaling, and shiny white areas were additional features in the lepra reaction. Conclusion: Yellowish brown and white structureless areas, associated vascular findings predominantly of linear irregular vessels, and variable loss of appendageal structures were key features throughout the spectrum. Sunflower-like appearance, rosette-like pattern and milky red background in histoid leprosy, target-like pattern in type 2 lepra reaction were the unique dermoscopic findings from our study.
麻风病和麻风反应病例的皮肤镜、临床和组织病理学方面:一项观察性横断面研究
背景:由于麻风病的无数临床表现,它成为一个诊断的挑战。皮肤镜检查可以显示肉眼通常看不到的皮肤结构,提供额外的形态学信息。目的:本研究的目的是研究和评价不同类型麻风和麻风反应的各种皮肤镜模式,并评估其与临床和组织病理学的关系。材料和方法:在伦理批准后1.5年多的时间里,在皮肤科OPD进行了一项描述性横断面研究。进行了全面的临床、体检、局部检查和大体照片。进行皮肤镜检查,分析皮肤镜特征。从同一病变处取活检。结果:对50例naïve麻风及麻风反应进行了研究,患者皮肤光型为IV ~ VI。男性(30人)多于女性(20人)。最常见的类型是交界性结核样麻风病(BT)(21.42%)。我们观察到黄褐色和白色无结构区域在组织学上对应于皮肤肉芽肿浸润,而血管的发现主要是线性不规则血管和阑尾结构的可变损失,在组织学上分别对应于血管周围和阑尾周围浸润,这是整个光谱的主要特征。结核菌极的附属物结构明显减少。我们注意到朝向结核极的色素网络减少,而朝向麻风极的色素网络则加重。滤泡堵塞、结垢和有光泽的白色区域是麻风反应的附加特征。结论:黄褐色和白色无结构区,相关血管表现主要为线状不规则血管,附件结构的变异性丧失是整个频谱的主要特征。组织麻风病的向日葵样外观,玫瑰样图案和乳红色背景,2型麻风反应的靶样图案是我们研究中独特的皮肤镜发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信