S19 Relevance of prediction scores derived from the SARS-CoV-2 first wave, in the UK COVID-19 second wave, for early discharge, severity and mortality: a PREDICT COVID UK prospective observational cohort study
H. Ghani, A. Navarra, E. Croft, H. Nur, M. Prabhakar, A. Azri Yahaya, I. Darwish, D. Longe, HL Lee, R. Vancheeswaran
{"title":"S19 Relevance of prediction scores derived from the SARS-CoV-2 first wave, in the UK COVID-19 second wave, for early discharge, severity and mortality: a PREDICT COVID UK prospective observational cohort study","authors":"H. Ghani, A. Navarra, E. Croft, H. Nur, M. Prabhakar, A. Azri Yahaya, I. Darwish, D. Longe, HL Lee, R. Vancheeswaran","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S19 Figure 1 SOARS and 4C mortality score in PREDICT and ISARIC cohorts Spoken sessions A16 Thorax 2021;76(Suppl 2):A1–A205 on N ovem er 2, 2021 by gest. P rocted by coright. httphorax.bm jcom / T hrax: frst pulished as 10.113orax-2021-B T S absacts.25 on 8 N ovem er 221. D ow nladed fom in the PREDICT cohort and 9.5% in the ISARIC cohort were admitted despite SOARS score of 0–1. Conclusion SOARS and 4C Mortality Score remains valid and relevant to their purpose, transforming complex clinical presentations into tangible numbers, aiding objective decision making, despite evolving viral subtype and treatment advances altering patient demographic and mortality. More importantly both scores are easily implemented within urgent care pathways for safe admission avoidance especially to a VH model. The new normal? Novel and remote strategies for pulmonary rehabilitation S20 COMBINING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY BEHAVIOURAL MODIFICATION STRATEGIES ALONGSIDE COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY DURING PULMONARY REHABILITATION IN PATIENTS WITH COPD: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PILOT RCT M Armstrong, E Hume, L McNeillie, F Chambers, L Wakenshaw, G Burns, K HeslopMarshall, I Vogiatzis. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 10.1136/thorax-2021-BTSabstracts.26 Introduction In patients with COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity, but continues to report inconsistent improvements in physical activity, particularly in those with low baseline physical activity levels. In addition, patients with elevated levels of anxiety and/or depression are typically less able to manage symptoms and improve physical activity. Objective To determine the efficacy of combining physical activity behavioural modification strategies (PA) with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) during PR in improving patients’ experiences of physical activity and steps/day in COPD patients with low baseline physical activity levels and high anxiety and/or depression. Methods In this pilot RCT, 23 patients (mean±SD: FEV1: 40 ±17%, baseline steps/day: 2913±1821, HADS Anxiety: 11±3, HADS Depression: 11±4) were assigned 1:1 to receive PR +CBT, or PA (comprising motivational interviews, step count monitoring, feedback using a pedometer and goal setting) alongside PR+CBT (PA+PR+CBT). Assessments included patients’ experiences of the amount and difficulty of physical activity captured by the Clinical PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (C-PPAC) instrument, accelerometer steps/day, the 6MWT, CAT and HADS questionnaires. Results We found significant and clinically important improvements in favour of PA+PR+CBT compared to PR+CBT intervention in the C-PPAC total score and steps/day. Meanwhile, similar significant and clinically important improvements in the 6MWT, CAT and HADS depression scores were reported across both groups (table 1). Conclusions Providing anxious and/or depressed patients with physical activity behavioural modification strategies alongside CBT during PR is more favourable for improving patients’ experiences of the amount and difficulty of physical activity and steps/day than providing CBT and PR. S21 FEASIBILITY OF SMARTPHONE-BASED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY TELE-COACHING IN LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS E Hume, H Muse, K Wallace, M Wilkinson, K Heslop-Marshall, A Nair, J Sanchez, J Benavent, J Roldan, S Clark, I Vogiatzis. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Chest Clinic, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Linkcare Health Services SL, Barcelona,","PeriodicalId":288005,"journal":{"name":"Predictive tools for acute deterioration in COVID-19 and beyond","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Predictive tools for acute deterioration in COVID-19 and beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
S19 Figure 1 SOARS and 4C mortality score in PREDICT and ISARIC cohorts Spoken sessions A16 Thorax 2021;76(Suppl 2):A1–A205 on N ovem er 2, 2021 by gest. P rocted by coright. httphorax.bm jcom / T hrax: frst pulished as 10.113orax-2021-B T S absacts.25 on 8 N ovem er 221. D ow nladed fom in the PREDICT cohort and 9.5% in the ISARIC cohort were admitted despite SOARS score of 0–1. Conclusion SOARS and 4C Mortality Score remains valid and relevant to their purpose, transforming complex clinical presentations into tangible numbers, aiding objective decision making, despite evolving viral subtype and treatment advances altering patient demographic and mortality. More importantly both scores are easily implemented within urgent care pathways for safe admission avoidance especially to a VH model. The new normal? Novel and remote strategies for pulmonary rehabilitation S20 COMBINING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY BEHAVIOURAL MODIFICATION STRATEGIES ALONGSIDE COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY DURING PULMONARY REHABILITATION IN PATIENTS WITH COPD: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PILOT RCT M Armstrong, E Hume, L McNeillie, F Chambers, L Wakenshaw, G Burns, K HeslopMarshall, I Vogiatzis. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 10.1136/thorax-2021-BTSabstracts.26 Introduction In patients with COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity, but continues to report inconsistent improvements in physical activity, particularly in those with low baseline physical activity levels. In addition, patients with elevated levels of anxiety and/or depression are typically less able to manage symptoms and improve physical activity. Objective To determine the efficacy of combining physical activity behavioural modification strategies (PA) with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) during PR in improving patients’ experiences of physical activity and steps/day in COPD patients with low baseline physical activity levels and high anxiety and/or depression. Methods In this pilot RCT, 23 patients (mean±SD: FEV1: 40 ±17%, baseline steps/day: 2913±1821, HADS Anxiety: 11±3, HADS Depression: 11±4) were assigned 1:1 to receive PR +CBT, or PA (comprising motivational interviews, step count monitoring, feedback using a pedometer and goal setting) alongside PR+CBT (PA+PR+CBT). Assessments included patients’ experiences of the amount and difficulty of physical activity captured by the Clinical PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (C-PPAC) instrument, accelerometer steps/day, the 6MWT, CAT and HADS questionnaires. Results We found significant and clinically important improvements in favour of PA+PR+CBT compared to PR+CBT intervention in the C-PPAC total score and steps/day. Meanwhile, similar significant and clinically important improvements in the 6MWT, CAT and HADS depression scores were reported across both groups (table 1). Conclusions Providing anxious and/or depressed patients with physical activity behavioural modification strategies alongside CBT during PR is more favourable for improving patients’ experiences of the amount and difficulty of physical activity and steps/day than providing CBT and PR. S21 FEASIBILITY OF SMARTPHONE-BASED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY TELE-COACHING IN LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS E Hume, H Muse, K Wallace, M Wilkinson, K Heslop-Marshall, A Nair, J Sanchez, J Benavent, J Roldan, S Clark, I Vogiatzis. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Chest Clinic, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Linkcare Health Services SL, Barcelona,
S19图1 PREDICT和ISARIC队列的SOARS和4C死亡率评分:口语会话A16胸腔2021;76(补充2):A1-A205, 2021年1月2日。P由赖特保护。httphorax。[jj.com / T hrax]首次发表为10.113orax-2021-B T S摘要。]8号楼25号楼221号楼。尽管SOARS的分数为0-1,但仍有10%的PREDICT队列和9.5%的ISARIC队列被录取。结论:尽管不断演变的病毒亚型和治疗进展改变了患者的人口统计学和死亡率,但SOARS和4C死亡率评分仍然有效且与其目的相关,将复杂的临床表现转化为有形的数字,帮助客观决策。更重要的是,这两种评分都很容易在紧急护理途径中实施,以避免安全入院,特别是对于VH模型。新常态?M . Armstrong, E . Hume, L . McNeillie, F . Chambers, L . Wakenshaw, G . Burns, K . HeslopMarshall, I . Vogiatzis在COPD患者肺康复过程中结合身体活动行为改变策略和认知行为疗法的新型远程肺康复策略[j]。诺森比亚大学,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔,英国;泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔医院NHS基金会信托基金,英国泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔10.1136/thorax-2021- btsabstract .26在COPD患者中,肺康复(PR)改善了运动能力,但在体力活动方面的改善仍不一致,特别是在那些基线体力活动水平较低的患者中。此外,焦虑和/或抑郁水平升高的患者通常无法控制症状和改善身体活动。目的探讨体育活动行为改变策略(PA)与认知行为治疗(CBT)相结合在PR期间改善低基线体育活动水平、高焦虑和/或抑郁COPD患者体育活动和步数/天体验的疗效。方法在这项先导RCT中,23例患者(平均±SD: FEV1: 40±17%,基线步数/天:2913±1821,HADS焦虑:11±3,HADS抑郁:11±4)按1:1分配接受PR+CBT或PA(包括动机访谈,步数监测,使用计步器反馈和目标设定)与PR+CBT (PA+PR+CBT)。评估包括慢性阻塞性肺病临床主动体力活动(C-PPAC)仪器、加速度计步数/天、6MWT、CAT和HADS问卷所记录的患者体力活动的数量和难度。结果我们发现,与PR+CBT干预相比,PA+PR+CBT干预在C-PPAC总分和步数/天方面有显著和临床重要的改善。与此同时,6MWT也有类似的显著且具有临床意义的改善。两组均报告了CAT和HADS抑郁评分(表1)。结论:在PR期间,为焦虑和/或抑郁患者提供身体活动行为改变策略和CBT,比提供CBT和PR更有利于改善患者对身体活动的数量和难度以及每天的步数的体验。K Heslop-Marshall, A Nair, J Sanchez, J Benavent, J Roldan, S Clark, I Vogiatzis。诺森比亚大学,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔,英国;移植研究所,弗里曼医院,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔NHS基金会信托,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔,英国;胸科诊所,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔医院NHS基金会信托,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔,英国;Linkcare Health Services SL,巴塞罗那,