The affinity entry consistency protocol

C. Bentes, R. Bianchini, C. Amorim
{"title":"The affinity entry consistency protocol","authors":"C. Bentes, R. Bianchini, C. Amorim","doi":"10.1109/ICPP.1997.622646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we propose a novel software-only distributed shared memory system (SW-DSM), the Affinity Entry Consistency (AEC) protocol. The protocol is based on Entry Consistency but, unlike previous approaches, does not require the explicit association of shared data to synchronization variables, uses the page as its coherence unit, and generates the set of modifications (in the form of diffs) made to shared pages eagerly. The AEC protocol hides the overhead of generating and applying diffs behind synchronization delays, and uses a novel technique, Lock Acquirer Prediction (LAP), to tolerate the overhead of transferring diffs through the network. LAP attempts to predict the next acquirer of a lock at the time of the release, so that the acquirer can be updated even before requesting ownership of the lack. Using execution-driven simulation of real applications, we show that LAP performs very well under AEC; LAP predictions are within the 80-97% range of accuracy. Our results also show that LAP improves performance by 7-28% for our applications. In addition we find that most of the diff creation overhead in the AEC protocol can usually be overlapped with synchronization latencies. A comparison against simulated TreadMarks shows that AEC outperforms TreadMarks by as much as 47%. We conclude that LAP is a useful technique for improving the performance of update-based SW-DSMs, while AEC is an efficient implementation of the Entry Consistency model.","PeriodicalId":221761,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Parallel Processing (Cat. No.97TB100162)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Parallel Processing (Cat. No.97TB100162)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.1997.622646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

In this paper we propose a novel software-only distributed shared memory system (SW-DSM), the Affinity Entry Consistency (AEC) protocol. The protocol is based on Entry Consistency but, unlike previous approaches, does not require the explicit association of shared data to synchronization variables, uses the page as its coherence unit, and generates the set of modifications (in the form of diffs) made to shared pages eagerly. The AEC protocol hides the overhead of generating and applying diffs behind synchronization delays, and uses a novel technique, Lock Acquirer Prediction (LAP), to tolerate the overhead of transferring diffs through the network. LAP attempts to predict the next acquirer of a lock at the time of the release, so that the acquirer can be updated even before requesting ownership of the lack. Using execution-driven simulation of real applications, we show that LAP performs very well under AEC; LAP predictions are within the 80-97% range of accuracy. Our results also show that LAP improves performance by 7-28% for our applications. In addition we find that most of the diff creation overhead in the AEC protocol can usually be overlapped with synchronization latencies. A comparison against simulated TreadMarks shows that AEC outperforms TreadMarks by as much as 47%. We conclude that LAP is a useful technique for improving the performance of update-based SW-DSMs, while AEC is an efficient implementation of the Entry Consistency model.
亲和性表项一致性协议
本文提出了一种新的纯软件分布式共享内存系统(SW-DSM),即亲和性条目一致性(AEC)协议。该协议基于条目一致性,但与以前的方法不同的是,它不需要将共享数据显式地关联到同步变量,而是使用页作为其一致性单元,并主动生成对共享页所做的一组修改(以差异的形式)。AEC协议将生成和应用差分的开销隐藏在同步延迟之后,并使用一种新的技术锁获取器预测(LAP)来容忍通过网络传输差分的开销。LAP尝试在释放锁时预测下一个获取锁的人,以便甚至在请求锁的所有权之前就可以更新获取锁的人。通过实际应用的执行驱动仿真,我们表明LAP在AEC下具有良好的性能;LAP预测的准确率在80-97%的范围内。我们的结果还表明,LAP将我们的应用程序的性能提高了7-28%。此外,我们发现AEC协议中的大多数diff创建开销通常与同步延迟重叠。与模拟的TreadMarks相比,AEC的性能比TreadMarks高出47%。我们得出结论,LAP是提高基于更新的sw - dsm性能的有用技术,而AEC是条目一致性模型的有效实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信