“Teamwork to Make the Dream Work”

T. Gonzales
{"title":"“Teamwork to Make the Dream Work”","authors":"T. Gonzales","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By tracing coalition building among grassroots community organizations, chapter 4 identifies the high level of mistrust among the lead agencies, the intermediary, and grassroots groups unaffiliated with the New Communities Program. Still, this chapter explains, these organizations collaborated and shared ideas, resources, and information. Goal-focused collaborative relationships—what the author terms networks of opportunity—provided benefits to both local residents and community organizations, but rather than working toward building trust, grassroots groups in these networks used their collective skepticism of the New Communities Program, the lead agencies, local politicians, and other external organizations as a tool to ensure a more careful evaluation of what they could accomplish. They thus assessed the information they shared with a more critical eye toward project outcomes. As this chapter explains, such an approach to networking, while potentially difficult and time-consuming, allows organizations to connect their local causes to broader national issues and is particularly useful in networks that contain unequal power relations. Within Greater Englewood and Little Village, two unique approaches emerged—partnering with local agencies and partnering with a broad network.\n","PeriodicalId":431728,"journal":{"name":"Building a Better Chicago","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building a Better Chicago","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By tracing coalition building among grassroots community organizations, chapter 4 identifies the high level of mistrust among the lead agencies, the intermediary, and grassroots groups unaffiliated with the New Communities Program. Still, this chapter explains, these organizations collaborated and shared ideas, resources, and information. Goal-focused collaborative relationships—what the author terms networks of opportunity—provided benefits to both local residents and community organizations, but rather than working toward building trust, grassroots groups in these networks used their collective skepticism of the New Communities Program, the lead agencies, local politicians, and other external organizations as a tool to ensure a more careful evaluation of what they could accomplish. They thus assessed the information they shared with a more critical eye toward project outcomes. As this chapter explains, such an approach to networking, while potentially difficult and time-consuming, allows organizations to connect their local causes to broader national issues and is particularly useful in networks that contain unequal power relations. Within Greater Englewood and Little Village, two unique approaches emerged—partnering with local agencies and partnering with a broad network.
“团队合作让梦想成真”
通过追踪基层社区组织之间的联盟建设,第四章确定了领导机构、中介机构和与新社区项目无关的基层组织之间的高度不信任。尽管如此,本章解释说,这些组织合作并共享想法、资源和信息。以目标为中心的合作关系——作者称之为机会网络——为当地居民和社区组织提供了好处,但这些网络中的基层团体并没有致力于建立信任,而是利用他们对新社区项目、牵头机构、当地政客和其他外部组织的集体怀疑,作为一种工具,以确保对他们所能取得的成就进行更仔细的评估。因此,他们以更挑剔的眼光来评估他们共享的信息。正如本章所解释的那样,这种建立网络的方法,虽然可能困难且耗时,但可以使组织将其地方事业与更广泛的国家问题联系起来,并且在包含不平等权力关系的网络中特别有用。在Greater Englewood和Little Village,出现了两种独特的方法——与当地机构合作和与广泛的网络合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信