{"title":"Georges Bataille’s «inner experience»: public self-execution for the sake of communication","authors":"Y. Butsykina","doi":"10.15407/fd2023.01.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper outlines the theoretical and methodological complexity of the historical-philosophi- cal study of Georges Bataille’s literary and philosophical heritage, In: particular «Inner Expe- rience», one of his key works, which is about to be released in Ukrainian. To this end, I analyze the biographical and historical-philosophical contexts of writing «Inner Experience». I observe the main events of the thinker’s life, which led to the writing of this work and testify to Bataille’s opposition to the most common artistic movements of the time (surrealism), philosophical theo- ries (existentialism), religious teachings, and, in fact, anti-systemic nature of his work. In addi- tion, the paper tends to identify sources of influence on the formation of philosophical views of Bataille in the period of «Inner Experience» writing. In particular, I analyze the theoretical and political relations of Bataille, especially with his critics (Belgian surrealists group, G. Marcel, J.-P. Sartre), but also allies (M. Blanchot, P. Klossowski, M. Leiris, H. Masson and others). Further, I study the genesis of the concept of «internal experience» formation, its inherent multi- faceted, multi-layered,and metaphorical nature, rooting in the tradition of Christian mysticism and reflecting the state after the loss of faith at the same time. Particularly, I study the image of the labyrinth as one of the most expressive synonyms of internal experience term, which empha- sizes the meaning of this fundamental word-concept of Bataille’s philosophy. To provide the in- tellectual context, I list main points of Bataille’s «Inner Experience» critique by representatives of the French intellectual communities of the 1940s, as well as the main Bataille’s arguments against this critique. Eventually, I analyze the main ideas of his «Inner Experience», as well as the ways how Bataille’s philosophy influenced the key representatives of the French poststruc- turalism (J. Derrida, M. Foucault, J. Kristeva, J.-F. Lyotard).","PeriodicalId":315902,"journal":{"name":"Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2023.01.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper outlines the theoretical and methodological complexity of the historical-philosophi- cal study of Georges Bataille’s literary and philosophical heritage, In: particular «Inner Expe- rience», one of his key works, which is about to be released in Ukrainian. To this end, I analyze the biographical and historical-philosophical contexts of writing «Inner Experience». I observe the main events of the thinker’s life, which led to the writing of this work and testify to Bataille’s opposition to the most common artistic movements of the time (surrealism), philosophical theo- ries (existentialism), religious teachings, and, in fact, anti-systemic nature of his work. In addi- tion, the paper tends to identify sources of influence on the formation of philosophical views of Bataille in the period of «Inner Experience» writing. In particular, I analyze the theoretical and political relations of Bataille, especially with his critics (Belgian surrealists group, G. Marcel, J.-P. Sartre), but also allies (M. Blanchot, P. Klossowski, M. Leiris, H. Masson and others). Further, I study the genesis of the concept of «internal experience» formation, its inherent multi- faceted, multi-layered,and metaphorical nature, rooting in the tradition of Christian mysticism and reflecting the state after the loss of faith at the same time. Particularly, I study the image of the labyrinth as one of the most expressive synonyms of internal experience term, which empha- sizes the meaning of this fundamental word-concept of Bataille’s philosophy. To provide the in- tellectual context, I list main points of Bataille’s «Inner Experience» critique by representatives of the French intellectual communities of the 1940s, as well as the main Bataille’s arguments against this critique. Eventually, I analyze the main ideas of his «Inner Experience», as well as the ways how Bataille’s philosophy influenced the key representatives of the French poststruc- turalism (J. Derrida, M. Foucault, J. Kristeva, J.-F. Lyotard).
本文概述了乔治·巴塔耶的文学和哲学遗产的历史哲学研究的理论和方法的复杂性,特别是«内心体验»,他的关键作品之一,即将在乌克兰发行。为此,我分析了写作《内心体验》的传记和历史哲学语境。我观察了这位思想家一生中的主要事件,这些事件导致了这部作品的写作,并证明了巴塔耶反对当时最常见的艺术运动(超现实主义)、哲学理论(存在主义)、宗教教义,事实上,他的作品具有反系统的性质。此外,本文还试图找出巴塔耶在《内心体验》写作时期哲学观形成的影响来源。我特别分析了巴塔耶的理论和政治关系,特别是与他的批评者(比利时超现实主义团体,G. Marcel, j . p .;萨特),还有盟友(布朗肖、克罗索夫斯基、莱里斯、马森等人)。进一步,我研究了“内在经验”形成概念的起源,其内在的多面性、多层次和隐喻性,植根于基督教神秘主义的传统,同时反映了失去信仰后的状态。特别地,我研究了迷宫的形象作为内部经验术语的最具表现力的同义词之一,它强调了巴塔耶哲学中这一基本概念的含义。为了提供知识背景,我列出了20世纪40年代法国知识界代表对巴塔耶的“内在经验”批判的要点,以及巴塔耶反对这一批判的主要论点。最后,我分析了巴塔耶的《内在经验》的主要思想,以及巴塔耶的哲学是如何影响法国后结构主义的主要代表人物的(J.德里达、M.福柯、J.克里斯蒂娃、J. f .弗朗索瓦)。Lyotard)。