Phishing detection: A recent intelligent machine learning comparison based on models content and features

Neda Abdelhamid, F. Thabtah, Hussein Abdel-jaber
{"title":"Phishing detection: A recent intelligent machine learning comparison based on models content and features","authors":"Neda Abdelhamid, F. Thabtah, Hussein Abdel-jaber","doi":"10.1109/ISI.2017.8004877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, numerous fake websites have been developed on the World Wide Web to mimic trusted websites, with the aim of stealing financial assets from users and organizations. This form of online attack is called phishing, and it has cost the online community and the various stakeholders hundreds of million Dollars. Therefore, effective counter measures that can accurately detect phishing are needed. Machine learning (ML) is a popular tool for data analysis and recently has shown promising results in combating phishing when contrasted with classic anti-phishing approaches, including awareness workshops, visualization and legal solutions. This article investigates ML techniques applicability to detect phishing attacks and describes their pros and cons. In particular, different types of ML techniques have been investigated to reveal the suitable options that can serve as anti-phishing tools. More importantly, we experimentally compare large numbers of ML techniques on real phishing datasets and with respect to different metrics. The purpose of the comparison is to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of ML predictive models and to show their actual performance when it comes to phishing attacks. The experimental results show that Covering approach models are more appropriate as anti-phishing solutions, especially for novice users, because of their simple yet effective knowledge bases in addition to their good phishing detection rate.","PeriodicalId":423696,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2017.8004877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

In the last decade, numerous fake websites have been developed on the World Wide Web to mimic trusted websites, with the aim of stealing financial assets from users and organizations. This form of online attack is called phishing, and it has cost the online community and the various stakeholders hundreds of million Dollars. Therefore, effective counter measures that can accurately detect phishing are needed. Machine learning (ML) is a popular tool for data analysis and recently has shown promising results in combating phishing when contrasted with classic anti-phishing approaches, including awareness workshops, visualization and legal solutions. This article investigates ML techniques applicability to detect phishing attacks and describes their pros and cons. In particular, different types of ML techniques have been investigated to reveal the suitable options that can serve as anti-phishing tools. More importantly, we experimentally compare large numbers of ML techniques on real phishing datasets and with respect to different metrics. The purpose of the comparison is to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of ML predictive models and to show their actual performance when it comes to phishing attacks. The experimental results show that Covering approach models are more appropriate as anti-phishing solutions, especially for novice users, because of their simple yet effective knowledge bases in addition to their good phishing detection rate.
网络钓鱼检测:基于模型内容和特征的智能机器学习比较
在过去的十年里,万维网上出现了许多假冒网站来模仿可信网站,目的是从用户和组织那里窃取金融资产。这种形式的在线攻击被称为网络钓鱼,它已经使在线社区和各种利益相关者损失了数亿美元。因此,需要有效的应对措施来准确检测网络钓鱼。机器学习(ML)是一种流行的数据分析工具,与传统的反网络钓鱼方法(包括意识研讨会、可视化和法律解决方案)相比,最近在打击网络钓鱼方面显示出了有希望的结果。本文研究了机器学习技术在检测网络钓鱼攻击中的适用性,并描述了它们的优缺点。特别是,研究了不同类型的机器学习技术,以揭示可以作为反网络钓鱼工具的合适选项。更重要的是,我们通过实验比较了真实网络钓鱼数据集和不同指标上的大量ML技术。比较的目的是揭示机器学习预测模型的优点和缺点,并展示它们在网络钓鱼攻击时的实际性能。实验结果表明,由于覆盖方法模型具有简单有效的知识库和良好的网络钓鱼检测率,因此更适合作为反网络钓鱼的解决方案,特别是对于新手用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信