IR meets NLP: On the Semantic Similarity between Subject-Verb-Object Phrases

Dmitrijs Milajevs, M. Sadrzadeh, T. Roelleke
{"title":"IR meets NLP: On the Semantic Similarity between Subject-Verb-Object Phrases","authors":"Dmitrijs Milajevs, M. Sadrzadeh, T. Roelleke","doi":"10.1145/2808194.2809448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the semantic similarity between phrases and sentences is an important task in natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR). We compare the quality of the distributional semantic NLP models against phrase-based semantic IR. The evaluation is based on the correlation between human judgements and model scores on a distributional phrase similarity task. We experiment with four NLP and two IR model variants. On the NLP side, models vary over normalization schemes and composition operators. On the IR side, models vary with respect to estimation of the probability of a term being in a document, namely P(t|d) where only term co-occurrence information is used and P(t|d, sim) which incorporates term distributional similarity. A mixture of the two methods is presented and evaluated. For both methods, word meanings are derived from large corpora of data: the BNC and ukWaC. One of the main findings is that grammatical distributional models give better scores than the IR models. This suggests that an IR model enriched with distributional linguistic information performs better in the long standing problem in IR of document retrieval where there is no direct symbolic relationship between query and document concepts.","PeriodicalId":440325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"387 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Measuring the semantic similarity between phrases and sentences is an important task in natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR). We compare the quality of the distributional semantic NLP models against phrase-based semantic IR. The evaluation is based on the correlation between human judgements and model scores on a distributional phrase similarity task. We experiment with four NLP and two IR model variants. On the NLP side, models vary over normalization schemes and composition operators. On the IR side, models vary with respect to estimation of the probability of a term being in a document, namely P(t|d) where only term co-occurrence information is used and P(t|d, sim) which incorporates term distributional similarity. A mixture of the two methods is presented and evaluated. For both methods, word meanings are derived from large corpora of data: the BNC and ukWaC. One of the main findings is that grammatical distributional models give better scores than the IR models. This suggests that an IR model enriched with distributional linguistic information performs better in the long standing problem in IR of document retrieval where there is no direct symbolic relationship between query and document concepts.
IR与NLP的结合:主谓宾短语语义相似性研究
短语和句子之间的语义相似度度量是自然语言处理和信息检索中的一项重要任务。我们比较了分布式语义NLP模型和基于短语的语义IR的质量。评估是基于人类判断和分布式短语相似度任务的模型得分之间的相关性。我们实验了四种NLP和两种IR模型变体。在NLP方面,模型随规范化方案和组合操作符而变化。在IR方面,模型在估计术语在文档中出现的概率方面有所不同,即P(t|d),其中仅使用术语共现信息,P(t|d, sim)包含术语分布相似度。提出并评价了这两种方法的混合。对于这两种方法,词义都是从大型数据语料库中派生出来的:BNC和ukWaC。其中一个主要发现是语法分布模型比IR模型给出更好的分数。这表明,一个丰富了分布语言信息的IR模型在长期存在的文档检索IR问题上表现更好,其中查询和文档概念之间没有直接的符号关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信