Opposing Viewpoints on Youth Social Media Banning in the U.S. for the Combatance of Extremist Recruiting

Lindsay A. West, Richard V. Martin, Courtney Perkins, Jennifer M. Quatel, G. Macgregor-Skinner
{"title":"Opposing Viewpoints on Youth Social Media Banning in the U.S. for the Combatance of Extremist Recruiting","authors":"Lindsay A. West, Richard V. Martin, Courtney Perkins, Jennifer M. Quatel, G. Macgregor-Skinner","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-7113-1.ch098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, terrorist groups are recruiting, inspiring, and guiding global strategies not just by Internet operations, but through an organized, steady infusion of propaganda videos and call-to-action messages. Most worrisome: increasing evidence that the youth population represents a particularly susceptible cohort, being drawn into the ranks of terrorist organizations operating worldwide. In response, this article will address the pros and cons of social media banning, its effects on constitutional rights, and its effectiveness towards decreasing radicalization and recruitment. The research presented here aims to further the field of Homeland Security and to encourage debates on how to decrease terrorism and youth recruitment and whether banning social media would assist the Department of Homeland Security's mission. In conclusion, this article explores both sides of the spectrum while offering insight for scholars, organizations, and practitioners regarding the attainability of social media banning in the United States.","PeriodicalId":171391,"journal":{"name":"Censorship, Surveillance, and Privacy","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Censorship, Surveillance, and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7113-1.ch098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, terrorist groups are recruiting, inspiring, and guiding global strategies not just by Internet operations, but through an organized, steady infusion of propaganda videos and call-to-action messages. Most worrisome: increasing evidence that the youth population represents a particularly susceptible cohort, being drawn into the ranks of terrorist organizations operating worldwide. In response, this article will address the pros and cons of social media banning, its effects on constitutional rights, and its effectiveness towards decreasing radicalization and recruitment. The research presented here aims to further the field of Homeland Security and to encourage debates on how to decrease terrorism and youth recruitment and whether banning social media would assist the Department of Homeland Security's mission. In conclusion, this article explores both sides of the spectrum while offering insight for scholars, organizations, and practitioners regarding the attainability of social media banning in the United States.
美国禁止青少年社交媒体打击极端分子招募的对立观点
今天,恐怖组织不仅通过互联网活动,而且通过有组织的、稳定的宣传视频和号召行动的信息来招募、激励和指导全球战略。最令人担忧的是:越来越多的证据表明,年轻人是一个特别容易受到影响的群体,他们被卷入了在世界各地活动的恐怖组织的行列。作为回应,本文将讨论禁止社交媒体的利弊,它对宪法权利的影响,以及它对减少激进化和招募的有效性。这里提出的研究旨在推动国土安全领域的发展,并鼓励就如何减少恐怖主义和青年招募以及禁止社交媒体是否有助于国土安全部的使命进行辩论。总之,这篇文章探讨了这两个方面,同时为学者、组织和实践者提供了关于在美国禁止社交媒体的可行性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信