What matters the most to people?

Costantino Balestra, Romina Boarini, Elena Tosetto
{"title":"What matters the most to people?","authors":"Costantino Balestra, Romina Boarini, Elena Tosetto","doi":"10.1787/EDF9A89A-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The OECD Better Life Index is an interactive composite index that aggregates average measures of country’s well-being outcomes through weights defined by users. This paper studies these weights by analysing the responses given by close to 130 000 users since 2011 to date. The paper has three goals. First, to investigate the factors shaping users’ preferences over a set of 11 well-being dimensions. Second, to provide insights into users’ preferences for a large group of countries which differ in terms of culture and living conditions. Third, to test for the effects of users’ satisfaction with respect to a given well-being dimension on the weight they attach to it, across different population groups. Various empirical models are used to identify responses’ patterns and see whether they can be accounted for by respondents’ characteristics and their perceived well-being. The paper finds that health status, education and life satisfaction are the aspects that matter the most for BLI users in OECD countries. Men assign more importance to income than women, while women value community and work-life balance more than men. Health, safety, housing and civic engagement become more important with age, while life satisfaction, work-life balance, jobs, income and community are particularly important for youth. There are also clear regional patterns in the choices by BLI users; for instance education, jobs and civic engagement are particularly important in South America while personal safety and work-life balance matter a lot in Asia-Pacific. Analysis carried out on a subset of observations (i.e. BLI-users who completed an extended questionnaire) finds that, for several well-being dimensions (i.e. jobs, housing, community, health, education, civic engagement, personal safety, life satisfaction and work-life balance), there is a positive and linear relationship between individual preferences and self-reported satisfaction in the same dimension, with evidence of distinctly different patterns of association within the population in the case of income and education.","PeriodicalId":196193,"journal":{"name":"OECD Statistics Working Papers","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Statistics Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/EDF9A89A-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The OECD Better Life Index is an interactive composite index that aggregates average measures of country’s well-being outcomes through weights defined by users. This paper studies these weights by analysing the responses given by close to 130 000 users since 2011 to date. The paper has three goals. First, to investigate the factors shaping users’ preferences over a set of 11 well-being dimensions. Second, to provide insights into users’ preferences for a large group of countries which differ in terms of culture and living conditions. Third, to test for the effects of users’ satisfaction with respect to a given well-being dimension on the weight they attach to it, across different population groups. Various empirical models are used to identify responses’ patterns and see whether they can be accounted for by respondents’ characteristics and their perceived well-being. The paper finds that health status, education and life satisfaction are the aspects that matter the most for BLI users in OECD countries. Men assign more importance to income than women, while women value community and work-life balance more than men. Health, safety, housing and civic engagement become more important with age, while life satisfaction, work-life balance, jobs, income and community are particularly important for youth. There are also clear regional patterns in the choices by BLI users; for instance education, jobs and civic engagement are particularly important in South America while personal safety and work-life balance matter a lot in Asia-Pacific. Analysis carried out on a subset of observations (i.e. BLI-users who completed an extended questionnaire) finds that, for several well-being dimensions (i.e. jobs, housing, community, health, education, civic engagement, personal safety, life satisfaction and work-life balance), there is a positive and linear relationship between individual preferences and self-reported satisfaction in the same dimension, with evidence of distinctly different patterns of association within the population in the case of income and education.
什么对人们来说最重要?
经合组织美好生活指数是一个交互式综合指数,通过用户定义的权重,汇总了各国福祉结果的平均衡量标准。本文通过分析自2011年以来近13万用户给出的回复来研究这些权重。本文有三个目标。首先,通过11个幸福感维度来研究影响用户偏好的因素。其次,为一大批文化和生活条件不同的国家提供用户偏好的见解。第三,在不同的人口群体中,测试用户对给定幸福感维度的满意度对其权重的影响。使用各种经验模型来确定响应模式,并查看它们是否可以由受访者的特征和他们的感知幸福感来解释。研究发现,健康状况、教育程度和生活满意度是经合组织国家BLI用户最关心的方面。男性比女性更重视收入,而女性比男性更重视社区和工作与生活的平衡。健康、安全、住房和公民参与随着年龄的增长变得越来越重要,而生活满意度、工作与生活平衡、工作、收入和社区对青年尤为重要。BLI用户的选择也存在明显的区域格局;例如,教育、就业和公民参与在南美洲尤为重要,而个人安全和工作与生活的平衡在亚太地区尤为重要。对观察结果子集(即完成扩展问卷的bi用户)进行的分析发现,对于几个福祉维度(即工作、住房、社区、健康、教育、公民参与、人身安全、生活满意度和工作与生活平衡),个人偏好与同一维度的自我报告满意度之间存在正线性关系。有证据表明,在收入和教育方面,人口中存在着明显不同的关联模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信