The Simplification Domestic Violence in Colleen Hoover’s It Ends with Us (2016)

Windasari Dwiastuti, Harumi Manik Ayu Yamin
{"title":"The Simplification Domestic Violence in Colleen Hoover’s It Ends with Us (2016)","authors":"Windasari Dwiastuti, Harumi Manik Ayu Yamin","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200729.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many popular culture genres have tried to address the issue of domestic violence, attempting to raise awareness, and empower people who experience violence in their relationships. However, domestic violence is a complex issue and is often misrepresented. Thus, critical appraisals of how popular cultural productions portray domestic violence are urgently required. To this end, the present article utilizes the qualitative research method of close textual reading to examine the peripheral characters of the novel, It Ends with Us (2016). The analysis evaluates the attitudes of these characters toward others and scrutinizes their reactions to the issue of domestic violence. The examination is grounded in theories such as Flood, Pease, Taylor, and Webster’s (2009) concept of attitudes and Schippers’ (2007) notion of hegemonic femininity. The findings of this study indicate that the majority of the characters in the novel exemplify a simplified perspective of domestic violence and tend to regard violence as a private and normal phenomenon in a marriage. The outcomes of the study also indicate that the attitudes of these characters toward domestic violence are influenced by several factors such as internalized patriarchal norms and perspectives on marriage. In conclusion, the peripheral characters of the novel fail to function maximally to support the abused female protagonist. The novel’s proposed solution to the issue of domestic violence is also overly simple: it does not propose professional intervention or punitive measures against the","PeriodicalId":368820,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International University Symposium on Humanities and Arts (INUSHARTS 2019)","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International University Symposium on Humanities and Arts (INUSHARTS 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200729.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many popular culture genres have tried to address the issue of domestic violence, attempting to raise awareness, and empower people who experience violence in their relationships. However, domestic violence is a complex issue and is often misrepresented. Thus, critical appraisals of how popular cultural productions portray domestic violence are urgently required. To this end, the present article utilizes the qualitative research method of close textual reading to examine the peripheral characters of the novel, It Ends with Us (2016). The analysis evaluates the attitudes of these characters toward others and scrutinizes their reactions to the issue of domestic violence. The examination is grounded in theories such as Flood, Pease, Taylor, and Webster’s (2009) concept of attitudes and Schippers’ (2007) notion of hegemonic femininity. The findings of this study indicate that the majority of the characters in the novel exemplify a simplified perspective of domestic violence and tend to regard violence as a private and normal phenomenon in a marriage. The outcomes of the study also indicate that the attitudes of these characters toward domestic violence are influenced by several factors such as internalized patriarchal norms and perspectives on marriage. In conclusion, the peripheral characters of the novel fail to function maximally to support the abused female protagonist. The novel’s proposed solution to the issue of domestic violence is also overly simple: it does not propose professional intervention or punitive measures against the
科琳·胡佛的《我们结束了》(2016)中简化的家庭暴力
许多流行文化流派都试图解决家庭暴力问题,试图提高人们的意识,并赋予那些在关系中遭受暴力的人权力。然而,家庭暴力是一个复杂的问题,经常被歪曲。因此,迫切需要对流行文化作品如何描绘家庭暴力进行批判性评价。为此,本文运用近距离文本阅读的定性研究方法来考察小说《我们结束了》(2016)的外围人物。分析评估了这些角色对他人的态度,并审视了他们对家庭暴力问题的反应。该研究的理论基础包括Flood、Pease、Taylor和Webster(2009)的态度概念和Schippers(2007)的霸权女性气质概念。本研究的结果表明,小说中的大多数人物都体现了一种简化的家庭暴力视角,并倾向于将暴力视为婚姻中的一种私人的、正常的现象。研究结果还表明,这些角色对家庭暴力的态度受到内化父权规范和婚姻观等因素的影响。综上所述,小说的外围人物未能最大限度地支持受虐待的女主人公。小说对家庭暴力问题提出的解决方案也过于简单:它没有提出专业干预或惩罚措施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信