Pull Request Prioritization Algorithm based on Acceptance and Response Probability

M. Azeem, Q. Peng, Qing Wang
{"title":"Pull Request Prioritization Algorithm based on Acceptance and Response Probability","authors":"M. Azeem, Q. Peng, Qing Wang","doi":"10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pull requests (PRs) prioritization is one of the main challenges faced by integrators in pull-based development. This is especially true for large open-source projects where hundreds of pull requests are submitted daily. Indeed, managing these pull requests manually consumes time and resources and may lead to delays in the reaction (i.e., acceptance or response) to enhancements or bug fixes suggested in the codebase by contributors. We propose an approach, called AR-Prioritizer (Acceptance and Response based Prioritizer), integrating a PRs prioritization mechanism that considers these two aspects. The results of our study demonstrate that our approach can recommend top@5, top@10, and top@20 most likely to be accepted and responded pull requests with Mean Average Precision of 95.3%, 89.6%, and 79.6% and Average Recall of 40%, 65.7%, and 92.9%. Moreover, AR-Prioritizer has outperformed the baseline models with a statistical significance in prioritizing the most likely to be accepted and responded to PRs.","PeriodicalId":301814,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pull requests (PRs) prioritization is one of the main challenges faced by integrators in pull-based development. This is especially true for large open-source projects where hundreds of pull requests are submitted daily. Indeed, managing these pull requests manually consumes time and resources and may lead to delays in the reaction (i.e., acceptance or response) to enhancements or bug fixes suggested in the codebase by contributors. We propose an approach, called AR-Prioritizer (Acceptance and Response based Prioritizer), integrating a PRs prioritization mechanism that considers these two aspects. The results of our study demonstrate that our approach can recommend top@5, top@10, and top@20 most likely to be accepted and responded pull requests with Mean Average Precision of 95.3%, 89.6%, and 79.6% and Average Recall of 40%, 65.7%, and 92.9%. Moreover, AR-Prioritizer has outperformed the baseline models with a statistical significance in prioritizing the most likely to be accepted and responded to PRs.
基于接受和响应概率的拉请求优先排序算法
在基于Pull的开发中,Pull请求(pr)的优先排序是集成商面临的主要挑战之一。对于每天提交数百个拉取请求的大型开源项目来说尤其如此。实际上,手动管理这些拉取请求会消耗时间和资源,并且可能导致对贡献者在代码库中建议的增强或错误修复的反应(即接受或响应)延迟。我们提出了一种方法,称为ar优先排序器(基于接受和响应的优先排序器),集成了考虑这两个方面的pr优先排序机制。我们的研究结果表明,我们的方法可以推荐top@5, top@10和top@20最有可能被接受和响应的拉请求,平均精度为95.3%,89.6%和79.6%,平均召回率为40%,65.7%和92.9%。此外,ar - priority在优先考虑最可能被接受和响应pr方面优于基线模型,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信