Towards mutation analysis for use cases

Huihui Zhang, T. Yue, Shaukat Ali, Chao Liu
{"title":"Towards mutation analysis for use cases","authors":"Huihui Zhang, T. Yue, Shaukat Ali, Chao Liu","doi":"10.1145/2976767.2976784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements inspection is a well-known method for detecting defects. Various defect detection techniques for requirements inspection have been widely applied in practice such as checklist and defect-based techniques. Use case modelling is a widely accepted requirements specification method in practice; therefore, inspecting defects in use case models in a cost-effective manner is an important challenge. However, it does not exist a systematic mutation analysis approach for evaluating inspection techniques for use case models. In this paper we present the methodology we followed to systematically derive mutation operators for use case models. More specifically, we first proposed a defect taxonomy defining 94 defect types, based on the IEEE Std. 830-1998 standard. Second, we systematically applied the basic guide words of the standardized Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) methodology to define 191 mutation operators. Last, we defined a set of guidelines for devising defect seeding strategies. The proposed methodology was evaluated by a real world case study and six case studies from the literature. Results show that all the derived mutation operators for Restricted Use Case Modelling (RUCM) models are feasible to apply and the defect taxonomy is the most comprehensive one to compare with the literature.","PeriodicalId":179690,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2976767.2976784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Requirements inspection is a well-known method for detecting defects. Various defect detection techniques for requirements inspection have been widely applied in practice such as checklist and defect-based techniques. Use case modelling is a widely accepted requirements specification method in practice; therefore, inspecting defects in use case models in a cost-effective manner is an important challenge. However, it does not exist a systematic mutation analysis approach for evaluating inspection techniques for use case models. In this paper we present the methodology we followed to systematically derive mutation operators for use case models. More specifically, we first proposed a defect taxonomy defining 94 defect types, based on the IEEE Std. 830-1998 standard. Second, we systematically applied the basic guide words of the standardized Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) methodology to define 191 mutation operators. Last, we defined a set of guidelines for devising defect seeding strategies. The proposed methodology was evaluated by a real world case study and six case studies from the literature. Results show that all the derived mutation operators for Restricted Use Case Modelling (RUCM) models are feasible to apply and the defect taxonomy is the most comprehensive one to compare with the literature.
对用例进行突变分析
需求检查是一种众所周知的缺陷检测方法。各种用于需求检查的缺陷检测技术在实践中得到了广泛的应用,如检查表技术和基于缺陷的技术。用例建模是实践中被广泛接受的需求规范方法;因此,以经济有效的方式检查用例模型中的缺陷是一个重要的挑战。然而,它不存在一个系统的突变分析方法来评估用例模型的检查技术。在本文中,我们提出了我们系统地为用例模型推导突变算子所遵循的方法。更具体地说,我们首先基于IEEE Std. 830-1998标准提出了一个定义了94种缺陷类型的缺陷分类法。其次,系统地应用标准化危害与可操作性研究(HAZOP)方法的基本指导词定义了191个突变操作符。最后,我们定义了一组设计缺陷播种策略的指导方针。提出的方法是通过一个现实世界的案例研究和六个案例研究从文献进行评估。结果表明,所导出的限制用例建模(RUCM)模型的变异算子都是可行的,缺陷分类与文献相比是最全面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信