NMR Study of Reservoirs Containing Fluids with Anomalous Physical and Chemical Properties

A. Potapov, M. Zagidullin
{"title":"NMR Study of Reservoirs Containing Fluids with Anomalous Physical and Chemical Properties","authors":"A. Potapov, M. Zagidullin","doi":"10.2118/196930-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The main goal of laboratory nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements is to verify the accuracy of the interpretation of nuclear magnetic logging (NML) data and to adjust this data to a petro physical model. To set up NML data for a petro physical model, it is necessary to perform laboratory NMR measurements, where the accuracy in studied samples depends on simulated saturation with one or other fluids.\n In most cases, laboratory research comes down to fraction porosity definition on hydrocarbon-cleaned, desalted, dried and saturated with reservoir water samples.\n Such formations as Bazhenov suite deposits and bituminous sands cannot be studied by NMR using the standard method. Carrying out the extraction leads to change of mechanical properties of samples: cavities appear in samples, they slough, storage capacity changes. Thus, storage capacity and mechanical properties will not correspond to their original properties. It is required to study these formations in naturally occurring saturated state.\n If the hydrogen index of the saturating fluid is different from unity, then for reliable estimate of storage capacity, a correction for hydrogen index of studied fluid is applied. It is possible to determine hydrogen index of studied fluid in the volume with current methods (oil in the volume, oil-field water in the volume, or their mixture in a certain ratio also in the volume). It is not always possible to determine the hydrogen index of the fluids that saturate the studied rock in the laboratory directly for a number of reasons.\n Kerogen, bitumen, heavy and light hydrocarbons and water are contained in the pore volume of the Bazhenov suite. (Manuilova, 2017) Bituminous sandstone formations contain extremely-high viscosity index oil with non-uniform viscosity and irreducible water. (Musin, 2015) In both of these cases, the average hydrogen index of the formation fluids is less than unity, therefore, the porosity determined by NMR will be underestimated. It is not possible to obtain fluid influx in the same ration like in a reservoir in these cases, so there is no chance to measure average HI of these fluids. Therefore, very important development stage of NMR technology is to determine the average HI of all fluids in the pore volume.\n Authors proposed fluid hydrogen index (HI) determination method on naturally saturated core within this work.\n The proposed method of hydrogen index determination is based on the registration of changes in the volume of the pore fluid by two methods before and after extraction. On one hand, the change in pore fluid volume before and after cleaning is determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Due to the hydrogen index that is different from the unity, the apparent change in the pore volume fluid will be recorded. Apparent change of pore fluid volume in studied fluid will be recorded because of differing unity. On the other hand, the change in the same volume is determined by the gas volumetric method as the difference in volumes of the solid phase before and after extraction. The volume of the solid phase will be changed by the amount of fluid volume after cleaning the pore space from fluids. Thus, the volume difference of the solid phase before and after extraction will be the true volume of the fluids contained in the researched sample. The hydrogen index will be defined as the ratio of apparent volume to true. The obtained hydrogen index is used as a correction factor to determine the porosity obtained by NMR (laboratory measurements of core with natural saturation and NML).\n The authors for the first time describe a method for hydrogen index determining directly on naturally saturated core samples which allows us to define the average hydrogen index of all fluids in a rock. The hydrogen index thus allows to introduce correction and determine the porosity more correctly.\n The shape of the sample does not matter for this method; no additional measurements of reservoir properties are required.","PeriodicalId":143392,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 22, 2019","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 22, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196930-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main goal of laboratory nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements is to verify the accuracy of the interpretation of nuclear magnetic logging (NML) data and to adjust this data to a petro physical model. To set up NML data for a petro physical model, it is necessary to perform laboratory NMR measurements, where the accuracy in studied samples depends on simulated saturation with one or other fluids. In most cases, laboratory research comes down to fraction porosity definition on hydrocarbon-cleaned, desalted, dried and saturated with reservoir water samples. Such formations as Bazhenov suite deposits and bituminous sands cannot be studied by NMR using the standard method. Carrying out the extraction leads to change of mechanical properties of samples: cavities appear in samples, they slough, storage capacity changes. Thus, storage capacity and mechanical properties will not correspond to their original properties. It is required to study these formations in naturally occurring saturated state. If the hydrogen index of the saturating fluid is different from unity, then for reliable estimate of storage capacity, a correction for hydrogen index of studied fluid is applied. It is possible to determine hydrogen index of studied fluid in the volume with current methods (oil in the volume, oil-field water in the volume, or their mixture in a certain ratio also in the volume). It is not always possible to determine the hydrogen index of the fluids that saturate the studied rock in the laboratory directly for a number of reasons. Kerogen, bitumen, heavy and light hydrocarbons and water are contained in the pore volume of the Bazhenov suite. (Manuilova, 2017) Bituminous sandstone formations contain extremely-high viscosity index oil with non-uniform viscosity and irreducible water. (Musin, 2015) In both of these cases, the average hydrogen index of the formation fluids is less than unity, therefore, the porosity determined by NMR will be underestimated. It is not possible to obtain fluid influx in the same ration like in a reservoir in these cases, so there is no chance to measure average HI of these fluids. Therefore, very important development stage of NMR technology is to determine the average HI of all fluids in the pore volume. Authors proposed fluid hydrogen index (HI) determination method on naturally saturated core within this work. The proposed method of hydrogen index determination is based on the registration of changes in the volume of the pore fluid by two methods before and after extraction. On one hand, the change in pore fluid volume before and after cleaning is determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Due to the hydrogen index that is different from the unity, the apparent change in the pore volume fluid will be recorded. Apparent change of pore fluid volume in studied fluid will be recorded because of differing unity. On the other hand, the change in the same volume is determined by the gas volumetric method as the difference in volumes of the solid phase before and after extraction. The volume of the solid phase will be changed by the amount of fluid volume after cleaning the pore space from fluids. Thus, the volume difference of the solid phase before and after extraction will be the true volume of the fluids contained in the researched sample. The hydrogen index will be defined as the ratio of apparent volume to true. The obtained hydrogen index is used as a correction factor to determine the porosity obtained by NMR (laboratory measurements of core with natural saturation and NML). The authors for the first time describe a method for hydrogen index determining directly on naturally saturated core samples which allows us to define the average hydrogen index of all fluids in a rock. The hydrogen index thus allows to introduce correction and determine the porosity more correctly. The shape of the sample does not matter for this method; no additional measurements of reservoir properties are required.
含异常物化性质流体储层的核磁共振研究
实验室核磁共振(NMR)测量的主要目标是验证核磁测井(NML)数据解释的准确性,并将这些数据调整为石油物理模型。为了建立石油物理模型的NML数据,有必要进行实验室核磁共振测量,其中所研究样品的准确性取决于一种或其他流体的模拟饱和度。在大多数情况下,实验室研究可以归结为烃类孔隙度的定义——用油藏水样清洗、脱盐、干燥和饱和。巴切诺夫套层和沥青砂等地层不能用标准的核磁共振方法进行研究。进行萃取会导致样品的力学性能发生变化:样品中出现空洞,脱落,储存量发生变化。因此,存储容量和机械性能将不符合其原始性能。需要在自然饱和状态下对这些地层进行研究。如果饱和流体的氢指数不一致,则为了可靠地估计储气量,应对所研究流体的氢指数进行修正。用现有的方法(体积中的油、体积中的油田水或它们的混合物按一定比例也在体积中)可以测定所研究流体的体积中的氢指数。由于若干原因,在实验室中直接测定浸透所研究岩石的流体的氢指数并不总是可能的。Bazhenov套的孔隙体积中含有干酪根、沥青、重烃和轻烃以及水。(Manuilova, 2017)沥青砂岩地层含有粘度指数极高的油,粘度不均匀,水不可还原。(Musin, 2015)在这两种情况下,地层流体的平均氢指数都小于1,因此,通过核磁共振确定的孔隙度会被低估。在这些情况下,不可能获得与油藏相同比例的流体流入,因此没有机会测量这些流体的平均HI。因此,确定孔隙体积内各种流体的平均HI是核磁共振技术发展的一个非常重要的阶段。提出了自然饱和岩心流体氢指数(HI)的测定方法。提出的氢指数测定方法是基于提取前后两种方法对孔隙流体体积变化的配准。一方面,通过核磁共振测定清洗前后孔隙流体体积的变化。由于氢指数与统一体不同,将记录孔隙体积流体的明显变化。由于不同的统一性,所研究的流体中孔隙流体体积会发生明显的变化。另一方面,相同体积下的变化量由气容法确定为萃取前后固相的体积差。从流体中清洗孔隙空间后,流体体积的大小将改变固相的体积。因此,萃取前后固相的体积差即为所研究样品中所含流体的真实体积。氢指数将定义为表观体积与真实体积的比值。获得的氢指数作为校正因子,用于确定核磁共振(具有自然饱和度和NML的岩心的实验室测量)获得的孔隙度。本文首次描述了一种直接测定自然饱和岩心样品氢指数的方法,该方法使我们能够确定岩石中所有流体的平均氢指数。因此,氢指数允许引入校正并更正确地确定孔隙度。对于这种方法,样品的形状无关紧要;不需要额外测量储层性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信