Clinical Response To Pericardiectomy At UNTH, Enugu Nigeria

Eze Jc, Upc Ugwuanyi
{"title":"Clinical Response To Pericardiectomy At UNTH, Enugu Nigeria","authors":"Eze Jc, Upc Ugwuanyi","doi":"10.4314/OJM.V16I1.29063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pericardiectomy as a means of surgical treatment is a standard procedure to improve the quality of life for patients with features of cardiac restriction. The aim of the study was to review the clinical response to pericardiectomy. \nMethods: A retrospective study of patients who had pericardiectomy between May 1995 and April 2000 was done. Records of relevant clinical features of the disorder necessitating pericardiectomy; diagnostic and prognostic investigations conducted were extracted from the case records. \nResults: A total of 36 patients were identified in the register as having had pericardiectomy in the period of review but only 21 (58.3%) case records were found. The clinical features noted were mainly of shortness of breath, abdominal, facial and feet swelling, ascites, low pulse pressure and tender hepatomegaly. There were pericardial effusion in 12(57%) and constrictive pericarditis 9 (42.9%) of the patients respectively. Sixteen patients (76.2%) had left anterolateral thoracotomy approach while 5 patients (23.8%) had sternotomy approach. Operative findings included thickened pericardium with or without effusion, pyopericardium, haemopericardium and calcified pericardium. Four months post surgery 14 patients (66.7%) had good clinical response while 4 patients (19%) had not responded favorably. Five patients (23.8%) were lost to follow-up after discharge. \nConclusion: Pericardiectomy is beneficial to patients who have constrictive pericarditis. Poverty is alimitation to uptake of pericardiectomy. Key Words: Constrictive Pericarditis; Pericardiectomy; Clinical Response Orient Journal of Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 4-7","PeriodicalId":104404,"journal":{"name":"Orient Journal of Medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orient Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/OJM.V16I1.29063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Pericardiectomy as a means of surgical treatment is a standard procedure to improve the quality of life for patients with features of cardiac restriction. The aim of the study was to review the clinical response to pericardiectomy. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who had pericardiectomy between May 1995 and April 2000 was done. Records of relevant clinical features of the disorder necessitating pericardiectomy; diagnostic and prognostic investigations conducted were extracted from the case records. Results: A total of 36 patients were identified in the register as having had pericardiectomy in the period of review but only 21 (58.3%) case records were found. The clinical features noted were mainly of shortness of breath, abdominal, facial and feet swelling, ascites, low pulse pressure and tender hepatomegaly. There were pericardial effusion in 12(57%) and constrictive pericarditis 9 (42.9%) of the patients respectively. Sixteen patients (76.2%) had left anterolateral thoracotomy approach while 5 patients (23.8%) had sternotomy approach. Operative findings included thickened pericardium with or without effusion, pyopericardium, haemopericardium and calcified pericardium. Four months post surgery 14 patients (66.7%) had good clinical response while 4 patients (19%) had not responded favorably. Five patients (23.8%) were lost to follow-up after discharge. Conclusion: Pericardiectomy is beneficial to patients who have constrictive pericarditis. Poverty is alimitation to uptake of pericardiectomy. Key Words: Constrictive Pericarditis; Pericardiectomy; Clinical Response Orient Journal of Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 4-7
尼日利亚埃努古UNTH对心包切除术的临床反应
目的:心包切开术作为一种外科治疗手段,是改善心脏功能受限患者生活质量的标准手术。本研究的目的是回顾心包切除术的临床反应。方法:对1995年5月至2000年4月行心包切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。需要行心包切除术的疾病的相关临床特征记录;从病例记录中提取诊断和预后调查。结果:在回顾期间,共有36例患者在登记册中被确定为心包切除术,但仅发现21例(58.3%)病例记录。临床表现以呼吸短促、腹、面、足肿胀、腹水、脉压低、肝压痛肿大为主。心包积液12例(57%),缩窄性心包炎9例(42.9%)。左前外侧开胸入路16例(76.2%),胸骨开胸入路5例(23.8%)。手术表现包括心包增厚伴或不伴积液、心包积血、心包钙化。术后4个月临床反应良好14例(66.7%),不良4例(19%)。出院后失访5例(23.8%)。结论:心包膜切除术对缩窄性心包炎是有益的。贫困是对心包切除术的限制。关键词:缩窄性心包炎;Pericardiectomy;临床反应东方医学杂志Vol.16(1) 2004: 4-7
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信