Active learning for personalizing treatment

Kun Deng, Joelle Pineau, S. Murphy
{"title":"Active learning for personalizing treatment","authors":"Kun Deng, Joelle Pineau, S. Murphy","doi":"10.1109/ADPRL.2011.5967348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The personalization of treatment via genetic biomarkers and other risk categories has drawn increasing interest among clinical researchers and scientists. A major challenge here is to construct individualized treatment rules (ITR), which recommend the best treatment for each of the different categories of individuals. In general, ITRs can be constructed using data from clinical trials, however these are generally very costly to run. In order to reduce the cost of learning an ITR, we explore active learning techniques designed to carefully decide whom to recruit, and which treatment to assign, throughout the online conduct of the clinical trial. As an initial investigation, we focus on simple ITRs that utilize a small number of subpopulation categories to personalize treatment. To minimize the maximal uncertainty regarding the treatment effects for each subpopulation, we propose the use of a minimax bandit model and provide an active learning policy for solving it. We evaluate our active learning policy using simulated data and data modeled after a clinical trial involving treatments for depressed individuals. We contrast this policy with other plausible active learning policies. The techniques presented in the paper may be generalized to tackle problems of efficient exploration in other domains.","PeriodicalId":406195,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ADPRL.2011.5967348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The personalization of treatment via genetic biomarkers and other risk categories has drawn increasing interest among clinical researchers and scientists. A major challenge here is to construct individualized treatment rules (ITR), which recommend the best treatment for each of the different categories of individuals. In general, ITRs can be constructed using data from clinical trials, however these are generally very costly to run. In order to reduce the cost of learning an ITR, we explore active learning techniques designed to carefully decide whom to recruit, and which treatment to assign, throughout the online conduct of the clinical trial. As an initial investigation, we focus on simple ITRs that utilize a small number of subpopulation categories to personalize treatment. To minimize the maximal uncertainty regarding the treatment effects for each subpopulation, we propose the use of a minimax bandit model and provide an active learning policy for solving it. We evaluate our active learning policy using simulated data and data modeled after a clinical trial involving treatments for depressed individuals. We contrast this policy with other plausible active learning policies. The techniques presented in the paper may be generalized to tackle problems of efficient exploration in other domains.
主动学习个性化治疗
通过基因生物标记和其他风险类别进行个性化治疗已经引起了临床研究人员和科学家越来越多的兴趣。这里的一个主要挑战是构建个性化治疗规则(ITR),它为每个不同类别的个体推荐最佳治疗。一般来说,itr可以使用临床试验的数据来构建,但是这些数据的运行通常非常昂贵。为了降低学习ITR的成本,我们探索了主动学习技术,旨在仔细决定招募谁,以及在整个在线临床试验过程中分配哪种治疗。作为初步调查,我们将重点放在简单的itr上,即利用少量亚人群类别进行个性化治疗。为了最小化每个亚群治疗效果的最大不确定性,我们建议使用最小最大强盗模型,并提供一个主动学习策略来解决它。我们使用模拟数据和抑郁症患者临床试验后的数据模型来评估我们的主动学习策略。我们将此政策与其他合理的主动学习政策进行对比。本文提出的技术可以推广到解决其他领域的有效勘探问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信