Government information sharing: a model for classifying benefits, barriers and risks

Karla Mendes Calo, Karina M. Cenci, P. Fillottrani, Elsa Estevez
{"title":"Government information sharing: a model for classifying benefits, barriers and risks","authors":"Karla Mendes Calo, Karina M. Cenci, P. Fillottrani, Elsa Estevez","doi":"10.1145/2691195.2691280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Government Information Sharing (Gov-IS) allows information exchange between different government agencies, as well as between public and private institutions. Sharing information enables enhanced efficiency -- by avoiding duplication of processes updating the same data; better quality of processes and services -- by removing inconsistent data and reducing error; and improved transparency -- by facilitating access to information. The implementation of Gov-IS initiatives requires different types of initiatives -- technical, organizational, institutional and political. In this work, we present findings of our research work studying Gov-IS benefits, barriers and risks. Our research relies on secondary data and case studies of Gov-IS initiatives implemented in four countries -- Australia, Estonia, New Zealand and USA. The main contribution of this paper is the multi-view classification of Gov-IS benefits, barriers and risks, and a detailed list of instances of such concepts, providing a comprehensive and benchmarking mechanism to understand, analyze and justify the planning and development of Gov-IS initiatives.","PeriodicalId":352305,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Government Information Sharing (Gov-IS) allows information exchange between different government agencies, as well as between public and private institutions. Sharing information enables enhanced efficiency -- by avoiding duplication of processes updating the same data; better quality of processes and services -- by removing inconsistent data and reducing error; and improved transparency -- by facilitating access to information. The implementation of Gov-IS initiatives requires different types of initiatives -- technical, organizational, institutional and political. In this work, we present findings of our research work studying Gov-IS benefits, barriers and risks. Our research relies on secondary data and case studies of Gov-IS initiatives implemented in four countries -- Australia, Estonia, New Zealand and USA. The main contribution of this paper is the multi-view classification of Gov-IS benefits, barriers and risks, and a detailed list of instances of such concepts, providing a comprehensive and benchmarking mechanism to understand, analyze and justify the planning and development of Gov-IS initiatives.
政府信息共享:利益、障碍和风险分类模型
政府信息共享(Gov-IS)允许不同政府机构之间以及公共和私人机构之间的信息交换。共享信息可以提高效率——避免重复更新相同数据的过程;提高流程和服务的质量——消除不一致的数据并减少错误;通过促进信息获取,提高透明度。政府信息系统倡议的实施需要不同类型的倡议——技术、组织、机构和政治。在这项工作中,我们介绍了我们研究政府信息系统的好处、障碍和风险的研究结果。我们的研究依赖于二手数据和四个国家(澳大利亚、爱沙尼亚、新西兰和美国)实施的政府信息系统倡议的案例研究。本文的主要贡献在于从多个角度对政府信息系统的利益、障碍和风险进行分类,并详细列出了这些概念的实例,提供了一个全面的基准机制,以理解、分析和证明政府信息系统计划和发展的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信