Assessment of asymmetry in pelvic motion – An inter- and intra-examiner reliability study

M. Åström, C. Gummesson
{"title":"Assessment of asymmetry in pelvic motion – An inter- and intra-examiner reliability study","authors":"M. Åström, C. Gummesson","doi":"10.3109/21679169.2014.884162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pelvic asymmetry has been suggested to change the biomechanics of the body and result in musculoskeletal pain. It is therefore of great relevance that there are tests that are reliable and valid when assessing pelvic asymmetry. The aim of this study was to examine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability for the standing flexion test (SFT), the initiation of the squat motion test (IOSMT) and the standing hip flexion test (SHFT), assessing asymmetry in pelvic motion around a transverse axis. Four experienced physiotherapists assessed in total 34 participants. Percentage agreement for inter-examiner reliability varied between 59% and 71% and kappa values between 0.2 and 0.4.The percentage agreement in intra-examiner reliability varied between 74% and 87% and kappa values between 0.4 and 0.7. A post hoc analysis of participants reporting low back and/or neck symptoms showed similar results in percentage agreement. A limitation in the present study was that the distribution of findings of pelvic mobility was skewed, which could have affected the kappa analysis. This study indicates in conclusion that SFT, IOSMT and SHFT may be reliable palpation tests in clinic settings. It is recommended that assessment of pelvic motion should include all three tests, since this showed higher reliability than when using the tests separately.","PeriodicalId":186472,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2014.884162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Pelvic asymmetry has been suggested to change the biomechanics of the body and result in musculoskeletal pain. It is therefore of great relevance that there are tests that are reliable and valid when assessing pelvic asymmetry. The aim of this study was to examine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability for the standing flexion test (SFT), the initiation of the squat motion test (IOSMT) and the standing hip flexion test (SHFT), assessing asymmetry in pelvic motion around a transverse axis. Four experienced physiotherapists assessed in total 34 participants. Percentage agreement for inter-examiner reliability varied between 59% and 71% and kappa values between 0.2 and 0.4.The percentage agreement in intra-examiner reliability varied between 74% and 87% and kappa values between 0.4 and 0.7. A post hoc analysis of participants reporting low back and/or neck symptoms showed similar results in percentage agreement. A limitation in the present study was that the distribution of findings of pelvic mobility was skewed, which could have affected the kappa analysis. This study indicates in conclusion that SFT, IOSMT and SHFT may be reliable palpation tests in clinic settings. It is recommended that assessment of pelvic motion should include all three tests, since this showed higher reliability than when using the tests separately.
骨盆运动不对称的评估-一项检查者之间和内部的可靠性研究
骨盆不对称被认为会改变身体的生物力学并导致肌肉骨骼疼痛。因此,在评估骨盆不对称时,有可靠和有效的测试是非常重要的。本研究的目的是检查站立屈曲测试(SFT)、开始蹲动测试(IOSMT)和站立髋关节屈曲测试(SHFT)的检查者之间和内部的可靠性,评估骨盆围绕横向轴运动的不对称性。共有34名参与者接受了4名经验丰富的物理治疗师的评估。内审信度的一致性百分比在59%和71%之间变化,kappa值在0.2和0.4之间变化。内部考官信度的一致性百分比在74% ~ 87%之间,kappa值在0.4 ~ 0.7之间。对报告腰背部和/或颈部症状的参与者的事后分析显示了相似的百分比一致性结果。本研究的一个局限性是盆腔活动的分布是倾斜的,这可能会影响kappa分析。本研究表明,SFT、IOSMT和SHFT可能是临床可靠的触诊检查。建议骨盆运动的评估应包括所有三项测试,因为这比单独使用这些测试显示出更高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书