Budgeting During a Recession Phase of the Business Cycle: The Georgia Experience

Thomas P. Lauth
{"title":"Budgeting During a Recession Phase of the Business Cycle: The Georgia Experience","authors":"Thomas P. Lauth","doi":"10.1111/1540-5850.2302003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the impact of the nation-wide recession on Georgia revenue and spending decisions in the 2002 and 2003 fiscal years. The state's strong economy and conservative revenue estimating practices historically provided a hedge against revenue shortfalls during a recession phase of the business cycle. However, when state revenue collections for FY 2002 were 5 percent less than collections for the prior fiscal year, several gap-closing measures became necessary, including state agency spending reductions and substitution of bond proceeds for tax revenues. These revenue and expenditure gap-closing measures were intended to enable the governor to achieve his policy initiatives while maintaining a balanced budget. The state's Rainy Day Fund remained full and was held in reserve for budget balancing in FY 2004, if necessary. Budget balancing during the current recession has been made possible by the state's practice of not over-committing to program increases and tax cuts during the expansion phase of the business cycle, and by effectively framing the issue of fiscal restraint.","PeriodicalId":135866,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.2302003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This article describes the impact of the nation-wide recession on Georgia revenue and spending decisions in the 2002 and 2003 fiscal years. The state's strong economy and conservative revenue estimating practices historically provided a hedge against revenue shortfalls during a recession phase of the business cycle. However, when state revenue collections for FY 2002 were 5 percent less than collections for the prior fiscal year, several gap-closing measures became necessary, including state agency spending reductions and substitution of bond proceeds for tax revenues. These revenue and expenditure gap-closing measures were intended to enable the governor to achieve his policy initiatives while maintaining a balanced budget. The state's Rainy Day Fund remained full and was held in reserve for budget balancing in FY 2004, if necessary. Budget balancing during the current recession has been made possible by the state's practice of not over-committing to program increases and tax cuts during the expansion phase of the business cycle, and by effectively framing the issue of fiscal restraint.
商业周期衰退阶段的预算:乔治亚州的经验
本文描述了2002年和2003年财政年度,全国范围内的经济衰退对格鲁吉亚收入和支出决策的影响。从历史上看,该州强劲的经济和保守的收入估算做法,为商业周期衰退阶段的收入不足提供了对冲。然而,当2002财年的州收入比上一财年的收入少5%时,就有必要采取一些弥补差距的措施,包括削减州机构支出和用债券收益代替税收收入。这些收入和支出差距缩小措施的目的是使州长能够实现他的政策倡议,同时保持预算平衡。该州的“雨天基金”保持充足,并在必要时作为2004财年预算平衡的储备。在当前的经济衰退中,预算平衡之所以成为可能,是因为该州在商业周期的扩张阶段没有过度承诺增加计划和减税,并有效地制定了财政约束问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信