Evaluating the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals

M. Ryan
{"title":"Evaluating the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals","authors":"M. Ryan","doi":"10.1787/F859F644-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial drugs are used in food animal production for several purposes: to treat a disease outbreak, to prevent disease, and to enhance feed efficiency and animal growth. While the technical benefits of antimicrobial use in animal production are well documented, there is a major lack of information on the economic impact on farmers’ incomes. This report reviews evidence on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials for the major animal producing species across several OECD countries as well as in Brazil and China. The findings indicate that the economic benefits are modest in modern farming systems where good production facilities, biosecurity measures, and management practices are in place. In large food animal producing countries such as Brazil, the use of antimicrobials is an important input to enhance the competitiveness of the industry. In China, the largest producer and user of antibiotics in animal production, antibiotics are often used as a substitute for less sanitary animal production facilities and the lack of appropriate biosecurity on the farm. This report concludes with several key policy options and practices, in particular those that induce farmers to place a greater emphasis on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials and alternative interventions in production in order to stem the rise in antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":141853,"journal":{"name":"OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/F859F644-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Antimicrobial drugs are used in food animal production for several purposes: to treat a disease outbreak, to prevent disease, and to enhance feed efficiency and animal growth. While the technical benefits of antimicrobial use in animal production are well documented, there is a major lack of information on the economic impact on farmers’ incomes. This report reviews evidence on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials for the major animal producing species across several OECD countries as well as in Brazil and China. The findings indicate that the economic benefits are modest in modern farming systems where good production facilities, biosecurity measures, and management practices are in place. In large food animal producing countries such as Brazil, the use of antimicrobials is an important input to enhance the competitiveness of the industry. In China, the largest producer and user of antibiotics in animal production, antibiotics are often used as a substitute for less sanitary animal production facilities and the lack of appropriate biosecurity on the farm. This report concludes with several key policy options and practices, in particular those that induce farmers to place a greater emphasis on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials and alternative interventions in production in order to stem the rise in antimicrobial resistance.
评估在食用动物中使用抗菌剂的经济效益和成本
在食用动物生产中使用抗菌药物有几个目的:治疗疾病爆发,预防疾病,提高饲料效率和动物生长。虽然在动物生产中使用抗菌素的技术效益有据可查,但严重缺乏有关其对农民收入的经济影响的信息。本报告审查了几个经合组织国家以及巴西和中国的主要动物生产物种使用抗菌剂的经济效益和成本的证据。研究结果表明,在良好的生产设施、生物安全措施和管理实践到位的现代农业系统中,经济效益并不高。在巴西等大型食用动物生产国,使用抗菌剂是提高该行业竞争力的一项重要投入。在中国,作为动物生产中最大的抗生素生产国和使用者,抗生素经常被用作替代卫生条件较差的动物生产设施和农场缺乏适当的生物安全措施。本报告总结了一些关键的政策选择和做法,特别是那些促使农民更加重视抗菌素的经济效益和成本以及生产中的替代干预措施,以遏制抗菌素耐药性上升的政策选择和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信