Using of Patient-Generated mHealth Data for Patient Care: a Comparison of Four Models

Frédéric Ehrler, C. Lovis, K. Blondon
{"title":"Using of Patient-Generated mHealth Data for Patient Care: a Comparison of Four Models","authors":"Frédéric Ehrler, C. Lovis, K. Blondon","doi":"10.4414/SMI.32.00357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid adoption of mobile applications for wellness and health tracking has resulted in vast amounts of patient-generated data. However, these data are often underutilized in the traditional patient care. In this paper, we explore how to use these patient-generated data to improve patient care. Based on a review of healthcare model and recommendations, we propose and compare four models with increasing integration with electronic health records. We also compared the freedom of choice of apps, as well as content validity and expected effectiveness. In the first model, patients have the full range of app choice, and full control over their data, in particular for sharing with healthcare providers. In the second model, patients use a selection of apps to export their data to a repository, which can be accessed by their providers (without integration into the EHR). In the third model, interoperability between the apps and the EHR allows full integration, but restricts app choice. Finally, the last model adds the notion of cost-effectiveness to the previous model. Although the EHR-integrated models limit app choice for patients, the app content is medically validated and patient-generated data is more easily accessed to improve patient care. However, these integrated models require decision support algorithms to avoid overwhelming the healthcare providers with data, and may not necessarily imply better quality patient care.","PeriodicalId":156842,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical informatics","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4414/SMI.32.00357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid adoption of mobile applications for wellness and health tracking has resulted in vast amounts of patient-generated data. However, these data are often underutilized in the traditional patient care. In this paper, we explore how to use these patient-generated data to improve patient care. Based on a review of healthcare model and recommendations, we propose and compare four models with increasing integration with electronic health records. We also compared the freedom of choice of apps, as well as content validity and expected effectiveness. In the first model, patients have the full range of app choice, and full control over their data, in particular for sharing with healthcare providers. In the second model, patients use a selection of apps to export their data to a repository, which can be accessed by their providers (without integration into the EHR). In the third model, interoperability between the apps and the EHR allows full integration, but restricts app choice. Finally, the last model adds the notion of cost-effectiveness to the previous model. Although the EHR-integrated models limit app choice for patients, the app content is medically validated and patient-generated data is more easily accessed to improve patient care. However, these integrated models require decision support algorithms to avoid overwhelming the healthcare providers with data, and may not necessarily imply better quality patient care.
使用患者生成的移动医疗数据进行患者护理:四种模型的比较
健康和健康跟踪的移动应用程序的迅速采用导致了大量患者生成的数据。然而,这些数据在传统的病人护理中往往没有得到充分利用。在本文中,我们探讨了如何使用这些患者生成的数据来改善患者护理。在回顾医疗保健模型和建议的基础上,我们提出并比较了与电子健康记录日益集成的四种模型。我们还比较了应用程序的选择自由,以及内容有效性和预期有效性。在第一种模式中,患者有全方位的应用程序选择,并完全控制他们的数据,特别是与医疗保健提供者共享。在第二种模式中,患者使用选定的应用程序将他们的数据导出到存储库,供他们的提供者访问(无需集成到EHR中)。在第三个模型中,应用程序和EHR之间的互操作性允许完全集成,但限制了应用程序的选择。最后,最后一个模型将成本效益的概念添加到前一个模型中。尽管ehr集成模型限制了患者的应用程序选择,但应用程序内容经过医学验证,患者生成的数据更容易访问,从而改善患者护理。然而,这些集成模型需要决策支持算法,以避免医疗保健提供者因数据过多而不堪重负,并且不一定意味着更好的患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信