Navya-Nyāya and the Maithila and Gauḍa Schools of Jurisprudence

Christopher T. Fleming
{"title":"Navya-Nyāya and the Maithila and Gauḍa Schools of Jurisprudence","authors":"Christopher T. Fleming","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198852377.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines two schools of Jurisprudence that emerged in eastern India between the fourteenth and the sixteenth centuries CE: that of Mithilā (Maithila/Miśra) and Bengal (Gauḍa). These schools of jurisprudence, in contrast to the school of thought that developed around Vijñāneśvara’s Ṛjumitākṣarā, were neither strictly academic nor pan-Indian. Rather, they were deeply regional (in interest, influence, and self-identification), isolated almost completely from Vijñāneśvara’s Mitākṣarā and its Mīmāṃsā-derived theories of ownership, highly competitive (particularly in Bengal), and influenced by Navya-Nyāya philosophical debates about ownership. The core legal and philosophical ideas analysed are ownership-by-the-death-of-the-previous-owner (uparamasvatva) and ownership as a śāstric (śāstraikasamadhigamya) phenomenon respectively.","PeriodicalId":363253,"journal":{"name":"Ownership and Inheritance in Sanskrit Jurisprudence","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ownership and Inheritance in Sanskrit Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198852377.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines two schools of Jurisprudence that emerged in eastern India between the fourteenth and the sixteenth centuries CE: that of Mithilā (Maithila/Miśra) and Bengal (Gauḍa). These schools of jurisprudence, in contrast to the school of thought that developed around Vijñāneśvara’s Ṛjumitākṣarā, were neither strictly academic nor pan-Indian. Rather, they were deeply regional (in interest, influence, and self-identification), isolated almost completely from Vijñāneśvara’s Mitākṣarā and its Mīmāṃsā-derived theories of ownership, highly competitive (particularly in Bengal), and influenced by Navya-Nyāya philosophical debates about ownership. The core legal and philosophical ideas analysed are ownership-by-the-death-of-the-previous-owner (uparamasvatva) and ownership as a śāstric (śāstraikasamadhigamya) phenomenon respectively.
Navya-Nyāya以及Maithila和Gauḍa法理学学派
本章考察了14世纪至16世纪在印度东部出现的两个法学流派:密提拉学派(Maithila/Miśra)和孟加拉学派(Gauḍa)。这些法理学学派,与围绕Vijñāneśvara的Ṛjumitākṣarā发展起来的思想学派相反,既不是严格的学术学派,也不是泛印度学派。相反,它们是深度地域性的(在利益、影响力和自我认同方面),几乎完全与Vijñāneśvara的Mitākṣarā及其Mīmāṃsā-derived所有权理论隔离,高度竞争(特别是在孟加拉),并受到Navya-Nyāya关于所有权的哲学辩论的影响。所分析的核心法律和哲学思想分别是前所有者死亡后的所有权(uparamasvatva)和所有权作为śāstric (śāstraikasamadhigamya)现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信