Physicochemical and Mineralogical Characterization of Uranium-Contaminated Soils

Y. Roh, S. Lee, S.-K. Choi, M. Elless, S. Y. Lee
{"title":"Physicochemical and Mineralogical Characterization of Uranium-Contaminated Soils","authors":"Y. Roh, S. Lee, S.-K. Choi, M. Elless, S. Y. Lee","doi":"10.1080/10588330091134356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physicochemical and mineralogical properties of the contaminants should be taken into account to decide a remediation strategy for a given radionuclide because development and optimization of soil remedial technologies are based on physicochemical and mineralogical separation techniques. The objectives of this study are to (1) demonstrate how a priori physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of soil contaminants can direct the development of remediation strategies and their performance evaluation for soil treatments and (2) understand the nature of uranium contamination and its association with the soil matrix by chemical extractions. This study examined two U-contaminated sites (K311 and K1300) at the DOE K-25 site, presently located at East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Uranium concentrations of the soils ranged from 1499 to 216,413 Bq kg−1 at both sites. Scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the dominant U phases are U oxides (schoepite), U-Ca-silicate (uranophane) and U silicate (coffinite) from the K311 site soils, whereas U-Ca-oxide and U-Ca-phosphate dominate in the K1300 site soils. Sodium carbonate/bicarbonate leaching was effective on the K1300 site soils, whereas citric acid leaching is effective on the K311 site soils. Sequential leaching showed that the majority of the uranium in the contaminated soils was contained in carbonate minerals (45%) and iron oxides (40%). Conventional leaching showed that citric acid treatment was most effective on the K311 site soils, whereas the sodium carbonate/ bicarbonate treatment was most effective on the K1300 site soils.","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Physicochemical and mineralogical properties of the contaminants should be taken into account to decide a remediation strategy for a given radionuclide because development and optimization of soil remedial technologies are based on physicochemical and mineralogical separation techniques. The objectives of this study are to (1) demonstrate how a priori physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of soil contaminants can direct the development of remediation strategies and their performance evaluation for soil treatments and (2) understand the nature of uranium contamination and its association with the soil matrix by chemical extractions. This study examined two U-contaminated sites (K311 and K1300) at the DOE K-25 site, presently located at East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Uranium concentrations of the soils ranged from 1499 to 216,413 Bq kg−1 at both sites. Scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the dominant U phases are U oxides (schoepite), U-Ca-silicate (uranophane) and U silicate (coffinite) from the K311 site soils, whereas U-Ca-oxide and U-Ca-phosphate dominate in the K1300 site soils. Sodium carbonate/bicarbonate leaching was effective on the K1300 site soils, whereas citric acid leaching is effective on the K311 site soils. Sequential leaching showed that the majority of the uranium in the contaminated soils was contained in carbonate minerals (45%) and iron oxides (40%). Conventional leaching showed that citric acid treatment was most effective on the K311 site soils, whereas the sodium carbonate/ bicarbonate treatment was most effective on the K1300 site soils.
铀污染土壤的物理化学和矿物学特征
由于土壤修复技术的发展和优化是基于理化和矿物学分离技术,因此在确定特定放射性核素的修复策略时应考虑污染物的理化和矿物学性质。本研究的目的是:(1)证明土壤污染物的先验物理化学和矿物学特征如何指导修复策略的发展及其对土壤处理的性能评估;(2)通过化学提取了解铀污染的性质及其与土壤基质的关系。本研究检查了位于美国能源部K-25站点的两个铀污染站点(K311和K1300),该站点目前位于田纳西州橡树岭的东田纳西科技园。两个地点土壤的铀浓度为1499至216,413 Bq kg−1。扫描电镜、背散射电子能谱和x射线衍射分析表明,K311点土壤中主要的U相为氧化铀(水辉石)、硅酸钙(铀矿)和硅酸钙(铀矿),而K1300点土壤中主要的U相为氧化钙和磷酸钙。碳酸钠/碳酸氢钠淋溶对K1300场地土壤有效,柠檬酸淋溶对K311场地土壤有效。顺序浸出结果表明,污染土壤中的铀主要以碳酸盐矿物(45%)和氧化铁(40%)形式存在。常规淋滤表明,柠檬酸处理对K311场地土壤的淋滤效果最好,而碳酸钠/碳酸氢钠处理对K1300场地土壤的淋滤效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信