{"title":"Individual Preferences on Grading Systems in Dental Schools","authors":"Mark Zmiyiwsky","doi":"10.33552/OJDOH.2018.01.000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to determine the type of grading system (pass/fail, pass/fail/pass with honors, traditional A-F grading) that individuals prefer in a sample of U.S. dental schools. Fifteen U.S. dental schools were selected, six of which used some type of pass/fail grading, the remainder used traditional grading and were randomly selected from a list of all U.S. dental schools. Six schools of the fifteen received the questionnaire which included demographic questions, questions on status as student or faculty, questions on current school grading system and individual preference for grading system types. Data was analyzed using an ANOVA with post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni method. Faculty significantly strongly disagree with pass/fail grading as compared to students (p=0.001, CI 3.07-3.70). Additionally dental school faculty were more likely to disagree with the pass/fail/pass with honors grading system than first and second year dental students (p=0.001, CI 2.74-3.38). Faculty agree significantly more with traditional grading compared to students. (p=0.001, CI 2.10-2.77). Overall faculty prefer traditional grading and disagree with pass/fail grading of both types especially compared to first and second year students concerning pass/fail/pass with honors grading. This study will add to a growing body of research on the benefits, risks and effects of varying types of grading systems used in dental schools and their relation to the potential success of students both in dental education and those entering into dental postgraduate education programs.","PeriodicalId":361768,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Dentistry & Oral Health","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Dentistry & Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/OJDOH.2018.01.000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the type of grading system (pass/fail, pass/fail/pass with honors, traditional A-F grading) that individuals prefer in a sample of U.S. dental schools. Fifteen U.S. dental schools were selected, six of which used some type of pass/fail grading, the remainder used traditional grading and were randomly selected from a list of all U.S. dental schools. Six schools of the fifteen received the questionnaire which included demographic questions, questions on status as student or faculty, questions on current school grading system and individual preference for grading system types. Data was analyzed using an ANOVA with post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni method. Faculty significantly strongly disagree with pass/fail grading as compared to students (p=0.001, CI 3.07-3.70). Additionally dental school faculty were more likely to disagree with the pass/fail/pass with honors grading system than first and second year dental students (p=0.001, CI 2.74-3.38). Faculty agree significantly more with traditional grading compared to students. (p=0.001, CI 2.10-2.77). Overall faculty prefer traditional grading and disagree with pass/fail grading of both types especially compared to first and second year students concerning pass/fail/pass with honors grading. This study will add to a growing body of research on the benefits, risks and effects of varying types of grading systems used in dental schools and their relation to the potential success of students both in dental education and those entering into dental postgraduate education programs.
本研究的目的是确定在美国牙科学校样本中个人喜欢的评分系统类型(及格/不及格,及格/不及格/荣誉及格,传统的a - f评分)。我们选择了15所美国牙科学校,其中6所采用某种及格/不及格评分,其余的采用传统评分,并从所有美国牙科学校的名单中随机选择。15所学校中的6所收到了调查问卷,其中包括人口统计问题、学生或教员身份问题、现行学校评分制度问题和个人对评分制度类型的偏好问题。数据分析采用方差分析和事后分析采用Bonferroni方法。与学生相比,教师明显强烈反对及格/不及格评分(p=0.001, CI 3.07-3.70)。此外,与一年级和二年级的牙科学生相比,牙科学校的教师更有可能不同意通过/不及格/通过荣誉评分系统(p=0.001, CI 2.74-3.38)。与学生相比,教师更认同传统的评分方式。(p=0.001, CI 2.10-2.77)。总体而言,教师更喜欢传统的评分方式,不同意两种类型的及格/不及格评分方式,特别是与一年级和二年级学生关于通过/不及格/通过的荣誉评分方式相比。这项研究将增加对牙科学校使用的不同类型的评分系统的好处、风险和影响的研究,以及它们与牙科教育和进入牙科研究生教育计划的学生的潜在成功的关系。