Development and Analysis of an Integrated Mild/Partial Gasification Combined (IMPGC) Cycle: Part 1 — Development of a Baseline IMPGC System

Ting Wang, Henry A. Long
{"title":"Development and Analysis of an Integrated Mild/Partial Gasification Combined (IMPGC) Cycle: Part 1 — Development of a Baseline IMPGC System","authors":"Ting Wang, Henry A. Long","doi":"10.1115/gt2019-91707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Around 50% of the world’s electrical power supply comes from the Rankine cycle, and the majority of existing Rankine cycle plants are driven by coal. Given how politically unattractive coal is as an energy resource in spite of its high energy content, it becomes necessary to find a way to utilize coal in a cleaner and more efficient manner. Designed as a potential retrofit option for existing Rankine cycle plants, the Integrated Mild/Partial Gasification Combined (IMPGC) Cycle is an attractive concept in cycle design that can greatly increase the efficiency of coal-based power plants, particularly for retrofitting an old Rankine cycle plant. Compared to the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), IMPGC uses mild gasification to purposefully leave most of the volatile matters within the feedstock intact (hence, yielding more chemical energy) compared to full gasification and uses partial gasification to leave some of the remaining char un-gasified compared to complete gasification. The larger hydrocarbons left over from the mild gasification process grant the resulting syngas a higher volumetric heating value, leading to a more efficient overall cycle performance. This is made possible due to the invention of a warm gas cleanup process invented by Research Triangle Institute (RTI), called the High Temperature Desulfurization Process (HTDP), which was recently commercialized. The leftover char can then be burned in a conventional boiler to boost the steam output of the bottom cycle, further increasing the efficiency of the plant, capable of achieving a thermal efficiency of 47.9% (LHV). The first part of this paper will analyze the individual concepts used to create the baseline IMPGC model, including the mild and partial gasification processes themselves, the warm gas cleanup system, and the integration of the boiler with the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Part 2 will then compare this baseline case with four other common types of power plants, including subcritical and ultra-supercritical Rankine cycles, IGCC, and natural gas.","PeriodicalId":341841,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Coal, Biomass, Hydrogen, and Alternative Fuels; Cycle Innovations; Electric Power; Industrial and Cogeneration; Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Coal, Biomass, Hydrogen, and Alternative Fuels; Cycle Innovations; Electric Power; Industrial and Cogeneration; Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2019-91707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 50% of the world’s electrical power supply comes from the Rankine cycle, and the majority of existing Rankine cycle plants are driven by coal. Given how politically unattractive coal is as an energy resource in spite of its high energy content, it becomes necessary to find a way to utilize coal in a cleaner and more efficient manner. Designed as a potential retrofit option for existing Rankine cycle plants, the Integrated Mild/Partial Gasification Combined (IMPGC) Cycle is an attractive concept in cycle design that can greatly increase the efficiency of coal-based power plants, particularly for retrofitting an old Rankine cycle plant. Compared to the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), IMPGC uses mild gasification to purposefully leave most of the volatile matters within the feedstock intact (hence, yielding more chemical energy) compared to full gasification and uses partial gasification to leave some of the remaining char un-gasified compared to complete gasification. The larger hydrocarbons left over from the mild gasification process grant the resulting syngas a higher volumetric heating value, leading to a more efficient overall cycle performance. This is made possible due to the invention of a warm gas cleanup process invented by Research Triangle Institute (RTI), called the High Temperature Desulfurization Process (HTDP), which was recently commercialized. The leftover char can then be burned in a conventional boiler to boost the steam output of the bottom cycle, further increasing the efficiency of the plant, capable of achieving a thermal efficiency of 47.9% (LHV). The first part of this paper will analyze the individual concepts used to create the baseline IMPGC model, including the mild and partial gasification processes themselves, the warm gas cleanup system, and the integration of the boiler with the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Part 2 will then compare this baseline case with four other common types of power plants, including subcritical and ultra-supercritical Rankine cycles, IGCC, and natural gas.
综合轻度/部分气化联合循环(IMPGC)的开发和分析:第1部分-基线IMPGC系统的开发
世界上大约50%的电力供应来自朗肯循环,而大多数现有的朗肯循环发电厂都是由煤炭驱动的。尽管煤炭的能量含量很高,但作为一种能源资源,它在政治上是多么没有吸引力,因此有必要找到一种更清洁、更有效地利用煤炭的方法。作为现有朗肯循环电厂的潜在改造选择,综合轻度/部分气化联合循环(IMPGC)循环是循环设计中一个有吸引力的概念,可以大大提高燃煤电厂的效率,特别是对旧朗肯循环电厂的改造。与综合气化联合循环(IGCC)相比,IMPGC使用轻度气化,与完全气化相比,有目的地使原料中的大部分挥发性物质保持完整(因此,产生更多的化学能),并使用部分气化,与完全气化相比,留下一些剩余的木炭未气化。轻度气化过程中剩余的大量碳氢化合物使生成的合成气具有更高的体积热值,从而实现更高效的整体循环性能。这是由于三角研究所(RTI)发明了一种名为高温脱硫工艺(HTDP)的热气体净化工艺,该工艺最近已实现商业化。剩余的焦炭可以在传统的锅炉中燃烧,以提高底部循环的蒸汽输出,进一步提高工厂的效率,能够达到47.9%的热效率(LHV)。本文的第一部分将分析用于创建基准IMPGC模型的各个概念,包括轻度和部分气化过程本身,热气体净化系统以及锅炉与热回收蒸汽发生器(HRSG)的集成。然后,第2部分将此基线情况与其他四种常见类型的发电厂进行比较,包括亚临界和超超临界兰金循环、IGCC和天然气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信