The Investigator's Dilemma - A Review of Social Media Analytics Research Ethics in Information Systems

Julian Marx, Milad Mirbabaie
{"title":"The Investigator's Dilemma - A Review of Social Media Analytics Research Ethics in Information Systems","authors":"Julian Marx, Milad Mirbabaie","doi":"10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media have become not only integral parts of our private and professional lives, but also an indispensable source of data for empirical research across a variety of academic disciplines. Applying a Social Media Analytics (SMA) methodology, however, imposes heavy ethical challenges on researchers. Scholars in the Information Systems (IS) discipline must deal with a patchwork of ethical frameworks, regulations, and (missing) institutional support. To initiate a debate on how to develop a common understanding of SMA research ethics, this paper compiles a scoping review of extant literature and suggests a research agenda for IS scholarship on this matter. The review yields a total of eight fundamental principles of ethical SMA research, which provide a starting point to guiding individual researchers towards more ethical conduct. At the same time, this work unearths a multitude of intricate dilemmas that are currently unresolved. The findings of this review will encourage IS scholarship to find its own voice in the debate about social media research ethics.","PeriodicalId":106236,"journal":{"name":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social media have become not only integral parts of our private and professional lives, but also an indispensable source of data for empirical research across a variety of academic disciplines. Applying a Social Media Analytics (SMA) methodology, however, imposes heavy ethical challenges on researchers. Scholars in the Information Systems (IS) discipline must deal with a patchwork of ethical frameworks, regulations, and (missing) institutional support. To initiate a debate on how to develop a common understanding of SMA research ethics, this paper compiles a scoping review of extant literature and suggests a research agenda for IS scholarship on this matter. The review yields a total of eight fundamental principles of ethical SMA research, which provide a starting point to guiding individual researchers towards more ethical conduct. At the same time, this work unearths a multitude of intricate dilemmas that are currently unresolved. The findings of this review will encourage IS scholarship to find its own voice in the debate about social media research ethics.
研究者的困境——对信息系统中社会媒体分析研究伦理的回顾
社交媒体不仅已经成为我们私人生活和职业生活中不可或缺的一部分,也是各种学科实证研究不可或缺的数据来源。然而,应用社会媒体分析(SMA)方法给研究人员带来了沉重的伦理挑战。信息系统(IS)学科的学者必须处理伦理框架、法规和(缺失的)制度支持的拼凑。为了引发一场关于如何形成对SMA研究伦理的共同理解的辩论,本文对现有文献进行了范围审查,并就这一问题提出了IS奖学金的研究议程。这篇综述总结了SMA研究的八项基本原则,为指导个体研究人员进行更道德的行为提供了一个起点。与此同时,这项工作揭示了许多目前尚未解决的复杂困境。这篇综述的发现将鼓励IS学者在关于社交媒体研究伦理的辩论中找到自己的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信