The role of data balancing for emotion classification using EEG signals

E. Pereira, H. Gomes
{"title":"The role of data balancing for emotion classification using EEG signals","authors":"E. Pereira, H. Gomes","doi":"10.1109/ICDSP.2016.7868619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we demonstrate the role of data balancing in experimental evaluation of emotion classification systems based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. ADASYN method was employed to create a balanced version of the DEAP EEG dataset. Experiments considered Support Vector Machine classifiers trained with HOC and PSD features to predict valence and arousal affective dimensions. Using signals from only four channels (Fp1, Fp2, F3 and F4) we obtained, after balancing, accuracies of 98% (valence) and 99% (arousal) for subject dependent experiments with three classes, and 85% (valence) and 87% (arousal) for two-class classification. However, accuracies for subject independent experiments were lower than the ones obtained using imbalanced datasets. We obtained accuracies of 52% (valence) and of 49% (arousal) for two classes, and accuracies of 36% (valence) and of 31% (arousal) for three classes. To explain the low accuracies in subject independent experiments, we present arguments and empirical evidence using correlations between the percentage of samples for each class and the accuracies obtained by approaches which did not use balanced datasets.","PeriodicalId":206199,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP)","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2016.7868619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate the role of data balancing in experimental evaluation of emotion classification systems based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. ADASYN method was employed to create a balanced version of the DEAP EEG dataset. Experiments considered Support Vector Machine classifiers trained with HOC and PSD features to predict valence and arousal affective dimensions. Using signals from only four channels (Fp1, Fp2, F3 and F4) we obtained, after balancing, accuracies of 98% (valence) and 99% (arousal) for subject dependent experiments with three classes, and 85% (valence) and 87% (arousal) for two-class classification. However, accuracies for subject independent experiments were lower than the ones obtained using imbalanced datasets. We obtained accuracies of 52% (valence) and of 49% (arousal) for two classes, and accuracies of 36% (valence) and of 31% (arousal) for three classes. To explain the low accuracies in subject independent experiments, we present arguments and empirical evidence using correlations between the percentage of samples for each class and the accuracies obtained by approaches which did not use balanced datasets.
数据平衡在脑电信号情绪分类中的作用
在本文中,我们展示了数据平衡在基于脑电图(EEG)信号的情绪分类系统的实验评估中的作用。采用ADASYN方法创建DEAP脑电数据集的平衡版本。实验考虑用HOC和PSD特征训练的支持向量机分类器来预测效价和觉醒情感维度。利用Fp1、Fp2、F3和F4四个通道的信号,经过平衡,我们获得了三个类别的受试者依赖实验的准确率为98%(效价)和99%(唤醒),两类别分类的准确率为85%(效价)和87%(唤醒)。然而,受试者独立实验的准确性低于使用不平衡数据集获得的准确性。两个类别的准确率分别为52%(效价)和49%(唤醒),三个类别的准确率分别为36%(效价)和31%(唤醒)。为了解释受试者独立实验中的低准确性,我们使用每个类别的样本百分比与不使用平衡数据集的方法获得的准确性之间的相关性来提出论点和经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信