When Should Organizations Be Liable for Transnational Bribery?

K. Davis
{"title":"When Should Organizations Be Liable for Transnational Bribery?","authors":"K. Davis","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190070809.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When should organizations, as opposed to individuals, be the targets of sanctions for transnational bribery? The OECD paradigm calls for the net of liability to be cast widely, not only over individual perpetrators but also over the organizations they represent, and perhaps also over companies that own, merge with, or acquire those entities. There have even been moves to sanction states whose officials have solicited or accepted bribes, including by barring recovery of compensation from the bribe payer. Organizational liability is typically justified as a way to induce private regulation, which is presumed to be relatively effective and efficient. However, the effectiveness of self-regulation is contingent on factors such as the presence of complementary legal institutions and expertise. There are also questions about its expense and legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":277745,"journal":{"name":"Between Impunity and Imperialism","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between Impunity and Imperialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190070809.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When should organizations, as opposed to individuals, be the targets of sanctions for transnational bribery? The OECD paradigm calls for the net of liability to be cast widely, not only over individual perpetrators but also over the organizations they represent, and perhaps also over companies that own, merge with, or acquire those entities. There have even been moves to sanction states whose officials have solicited or accepted bribes, including by barring recovery of compensation from the bribe payer. Organizational liability is typically justified as a way to induce private regulation, which is presumed to be relatively effective and efficient. However, the effectiveness of self-regulation is contingent on factors such as the presence of complementary legal institutions and expertise. There are also questions about its expense and legitimacy.
组织何时应对跨国贿赂承担责任?
什么时候组织应该成为跨国贿赂的制裁对象,而不是个人?经合组织的范例要求将责任之网撒得更广,不仅撒到肇事者个人身上,也撒到他们所代表的组织身上,也许还撒到拥有、合并或收购这些实体的公司身上。甚至还出现了制裁官员索取或收受贿赂的国家的举措,包括禁止向行贿方追讨赔偿。组织责任通常被认为是诱导私人监管的一种方式,这被认为是相对有效和高效的。然而,自我监管的有效性取决于诸如是否存在互补的法律机构和专门知识等因素。也有人质疑它的费用和合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信