Freedom as Nondomination

{"title":"Freedom as Nondomination","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197572214.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing an overview of the modern republican conception of freedom, this interview starts with Philip Pettit’s account of ethical foundations. He argues against a rights-based approach; politics should seek to maximize goods in his view, rights are simply rules for ensuring these goods. The good he has in mind is freedom as nondomination. According to this view freedom is not simply being left alone, it is being in a position where nobody has the power to so constrain your action (even if that power is not being used). The chapter ends by considering the implications of such a view. Most obviously it would require a democratic form of government in which state power is both responsive to the people but also seriously constrained. Further Pettit argues this conception of freedom would require us to constrain the power of huge corporations—these too may be sources of domination.","PeriodicalId":111427,"journal":{"name":"What is Freedom?","volume":"64 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What is Freedom?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572214.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing an overview of the modern republican conception of freedom, this interview starts with Philip Pettit’s account of ethical foundations. He argues against a rights-based approach; politics should seek to maximize goods in his view, rights are simply rules for ensuring these goods. The good he has in mind is freedom as nondomination. According to this view freedom is not simply being left alone, it is being in a position where nobody has the power to so constrain your action (even if that power is not being used). The chapter ends by considering the implications of such a view. Most obviously it would require a democratic form of government in which state power is both responsive to the people but also seriously constrained. Further Pettit argues this conception of freedom would require us to constrain the power of huge corporations—these too may be sources of domination.
自由即非统治
本文从菲利普·佩蒂特对伦理基础的阐述开始,概述了现代共和主义的自由概念。他反对以权利为基础的方法;在他看来,政治应该寻求利益最大化,权利只是确保这些利益的规则。他心目中的善是作为非统治的自由。根据这种观点,自由并不是简单的独处,而是处于一种没有人有权力约束你的行动的状态(即使这种权力没有被使用)。本章最后考虑了这种观点的含义。最明显的是,它需要一种民主形式的政府,在这种政府中,国家权力既要对人民负责,又要受到严格的限制。佩蒂特进一步认为,这种自由的概念要求我们限制大公司的权力——它们也可能是支配的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信