N. Fontaine, J. Gresset, H. Boisjoly, I. Brunette, M. Le François, J. Deschênes, R. Bazin, P. Laughrea, I. Dubé, M. Charest
{"title":"Relation between Self-Perceived Status of Visual Functioning (VF-14) and Indices of Functional Vision Derived from Visual Acuity Measurements","authors":"N. Fontaine, J. Gresset, H. Boisjoly, I. Brunette, M. Le François, J. Deschênes, R. Bazin, P. Laughrea, I. Dubé, M. Charest","doi":"10.1364/vsia.1998.sae.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many sources have advocated the use of indices of functional vision to measure the severity of visual impairment and their consequences on the quality of life. Different methods have been proposed. Traditional methods rely on monocular or binocular visual acuity (VA). The severity scale of impairment of the World Health Organisation1 is based on the best-eye VA and/or on the visual field. Other methods use various combinations of monocular VA (expressed as percentages) to calculate \"weighted binocular scores\", as proposed by the American Medical Association2 or Colenbrander3. A more recent approach, relies on the self-perceived status of visual functioning as measured by vision-related questionnaires. A variety of instruments have been devised to assess vision-targeted functional performance associated with visual impairment in subjects with cataract4-7. Of these, the Visual Functioning Index (VF-14) is one of the most widely used. The reliability, validity as well as the responsive ness of the VF-14 has been well documented in the case of cataract surgery7-10. In addition, this questionnaire has recently been validated for the evaluation of corneal and other ocular diseases11, 12","PeriodicalId":428257,"journal":{"name":"Vision Science and its Applications","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Science and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.1998.sae.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many sources have advocated the use of indices of functional vision to measure the severity of visual impairment and their consequences on the quality of life. Different methods have been proposed. Traditional methods rely on monocular or binocular visual acuity (VA). The severity scale of impairment of the World Health Organisation1 is based on the best-eye VA and/or on the visual field. Other methods use various combinations of monocular VA (expressed as percentages) to calculate "weighted binocular scores", as proposed by the American Medical Association2 or Colenbrander3. A more recent approach, relies on the self-perceived status of visual functioning as measured by vision-related questionnaires. A variety of instruments have been devised to assess vision-targeted functional performance associated with visual impairment in subjects with cataract4-7. Of these, the Visual Functioning Index (VF-14) is one of the most widely used. The reliability, validity as well as the responsive ness of the VF-14 has been well documented in the case of cataract surgery7-10. In addition, this questionnaire has recently been validated for the evaluation of corneal and other ocular diseases11, 12
许多来源都主张使用功能性视力指数来衡量视力损害的严重程度及其对生活质量的影响。人们提出了不同的方法。传统的方法依赖于单眼或双目视力(VA)。世界卫生组织(World Health organization)的视力损害严重程度分级标准1是基于最佳眼视力和/或视野。其他方法采用单目VA的各种组合(以百分比表示)来计算“加权双眼评分”,如美国医学协会(American Medical association)或Colenbrander3提出的。最近的一种方法,依赖于通过视觉相关问卷测量的视觉功能的自我感知状态。已经设计了各种各样的仪器来评估白内障患者与视力损害相关的以视力为目标的功能表现。其中,视觉功能指数(VF-14)是使用最广泛的一种。在白内障手术中,VF-14的可靠性、有效性和反应性已经得到了很好的证明[7-10]。此外,该问卷最近已被验证用于评估角膜和其他眼部疾病11,12