A Comparative Study of RFID Solutions for Security and Privacy: POP vs. Previous Solutions

2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008) Pub Date : 2008-04-24 DOI:10.1109/ISA.2008.89

K. Koralalage, Jingde Cheng

{"title":"A Comparative Study of RFID Solutions for Security and Privacy: POP vs. Previous Solutions","authors":"K. Koralalage, Jingde Cheng","doi":"10.1109/ISA.2008.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a true ubiquitous world, RFID tags will be available in everything, everywhere, and at all times. However, since those tags are bounded with constraints, with no foolproof method to manage the changing hands of the same-tagged item, there is no assurance of privacy and security in passive tags. Yet there are several vender specific solutions but none of them comprehensively solve the security risks and privacy threats arise in the domain of product lifecycle. Thus, there is a need to recognize a standard solution at least for a specific domain. Therefore we proposed the POP Method that comprehensively solves the problems arising in the domain of product lifecycle. In this paper, we compare and contrast the available major solutions against the POP method. We first provide evaluation criteria, and then we survey major proposed solutions, including ours. Next, we present the evaluation results addressing the security and privacy together with the functional aspects. Finally, we conclude the paper by realizing the best available solution for the product lifecycle with passive tags.","PeriodicalId":212375,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISA.2008.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Abstract

In a true ubiquitous world, RFID tags will be available in everything, everywhere, and at all times. However, since those tags are bounded with constraints, with no foolproof method to manage the changing hands of the same-tagged item, there is no assurance of privacy and security in passive tags. Yet there are several vender specific solutions but none of them comprehensively solve the security risks and privacy threats arise in the domain of product lifecycle. Thus, there is a need to recognize a standard solution at least for a specific domain. Therefore we proposed the POP Method that comprehensively solves the problems arising in the domain of product lifecycle. In this paper, we compare and contrast the available major solutions against the POP method. We first provide evaluation criteria, and then we survey major proposed solutions, including ours. Next, we present the evaluation results addressing the security and privacy together with the functional aspects. Finally, we conclude the paper by realizing the best available solution for the product lifecycle with passive tags.

查看原文本刊更多论文

RFID安全与隐私解决方案之比较研究:POP与先前解决方案

在一个真正的无所不在的世界里，RFID标签将在任何地方、任何时候都可用。然而，由于这些标签受到约束，没有万无一失的方法来管理同一标签物品的易手情况，因此被动标签无法保证隐私和安全。然而，虽然有一些针对供应商的解决方案，但没有一个能够全面解决产品生命周期中出现的安全风险和隐私威胁。因此，需要识别至少针对特定领域的标准解决方案。因此，我们提出了全面解决产品生命周期领域问题的POP方法。在本文中，我们将现有的主要解决方案与POP方法进行了比较和对比。我们首先提供评估标准，然后调查主要提出的解决方案，包括我们的解决方案。接下来，我们给出了安全性和隐私性以及功能方面的评估结果。最后，我们通过实现无源标签产品生命周期的最佳可用解决方案来结束本文。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)

自引率

0.00%

发文量