Gender Differences in the Description of Erotic and Mystical Experiences

James R. Hall
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Description of Erotic and Mystical Experiences","authors":"James R. Hall","doi":"10.2307/3509884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using three different samples, self reports of sexual and mystical experiences, and forced choice utilization of agentive and receptive words to describe both mystical and erotic experiences, this research offers at least partial support for predicted gender differences in descriptions of erotic and mystical experiences. As predicted, females used receptive language to describe both erotic and mystical experiences. While males, as predicted, used agentive language to describe erotic experiences, they did not use agentive language to describe mystical experiences. The failure of males to use agentive language for mystical experiences is discussed in terms of the historically documented difficulty of males to experie:nce, union, agentively expressed, with a masculine conceptualized god image.","PeriodicalId":175594,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3509884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Using three different samples, self reports of sexual and mystical experiences, and forced choice utilization of agentive and receptive words to describe both mystical and erotic experiences, this research offers at least partial support for predicted gender differences in descriptions of erotic and mystical experiences. As predicted, females used receptive language to describe both erotic and mystical experiences. While males, as predicted, used agentive language to describe erotic experiences, they did not use agentive language to describe mystical experiences. The failure of males to use agentive language for mystical experiences is discussed in terms of the historically documented difficulty of males to experie:nce, union, agentively expressed, with a masculine conceptualized god image.
性爱与神秘体验描述中的性别差异
本研究使用三个不同的样本,性和神秘体验的自我报告,以及代理和接受词在描述神秘和色情体验时的强制性选择,至少部分地支持了对色情和神秘体验描述中的性别差异的预测。正如预测的那样,女性使用接受性语言来描述情爱和神秘的体验。正如预测的那样,男性会用代理语言来描述情爱体验,但他们不会用代理语言来描述神秘体验。男性在神秘体验中使用代理语言的失败是根据历史记载的男性体验的困难来讨论的:once, union,代理表达,带有男性概念化的上帝形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信