Impact Joining of Metallic Sheets and Evaluation of its Performance

M. Nikawa, T. Shibuya, M. Yamashita
{"title":"Impact Joining of Metallic Sheets and Evaluation of its Performance","authors":"M. Nikawa, T. Shibuya, M. Yamashita","doi":"10.21741/9781644900338-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Similar or dissimilar metallic sheets were joined at their edges by the original impact joining method developed by one of the authors. Surface layers of both sheet edges activated by high-speed shear are immediately contacted with sliding motion in the joining process. The whole processing time is within a few milliseconds. The materials tested were mild steel and titanium sheets. Drop-weight impact testing machine was used. Joining performance of the fabricated sheets was evaluated by tensile test, etc. The joining was not available all over the thickness between sheets, in which sharp notch was observed near both sheet surfaces. The central portion was successfully joined without cavity. The joined specimen of mild steel and titanium was sliced to remove surfaces with such notch. Fracture occurs at the part of mild steel whose strength is lower, then the joining boundary was not damaged. Introduction It is well known that time and temperature effects have important role in solid state joining by atomic diffusion at elevated temperature. On the other hand, under cold condition, if the surface expansion is relatively large, two metal parts can join at the newly created surface, in which the brittle oxidized surface layer fractures. Joining strength in solid state welding was found to be approximately equal to the normal applied stress during the process in the absence of oxide films for the case of aluminum welded together in 1970 [1]. The film theory of such kind of welding or bonding was established, in which roll bonding was applied in 1983 [2]. Recently the film theory was used to derive a model that quantifies the relevance of these parameters to the weld strength [3]. Cold bonding may have a potential for recycling scrap aluminum [4]. The diffusion bonding is usually achieved by very high compressive stress with large plastic deformation. The shape drastically changes from the initial one and the joining strength also depends on the initial surface condition. Surface treatment is necessary for removal of the dirty surface layer. Experimental results in diffusion bonding were summarized for various metals including superplastic alloys [5]. Joining of different metals were tested [6] and experiments were carried out using super plastic materials [7, 8]. Hot isostatic pressing was also effective for the diffusion bonding of the nickel powder onto alumina tubing [9]. Divergent extrusion was used for bonding of aluminum by means of two opposing punches and finite element simulations was conducted [10]. However, the method requires very special conditions in temperature, atmosphere, surface treatment, etc. and they are very time consuming. One of the authors proposed a novel joining method for sheet metal [11]. The edge of the sheet is joined to another edge, where the sheet thickness is unchanged, because the plates are not plastically compressed. In the present study, the materials are mild steel and pure titanium sheets. Main objectives are to observe the motion of the tools and the materials in the device, and to check the Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 91-96 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-16 92 deformation performance of the sheet composed of different materials by tensile and bending tests. The boundary was also inspected by elemental analysis. Experimental device and materials tested The impact joining setup is shown in Fig.1. The device is driven by an impact of drop-weight. The mass was 22 kg and the impact velocity was 10 m/s. The left half of the lower sheet is supported by the counter punch, whose reactive force is given by compressing the circular pipe (A6061, 12 mm diameter and 1 mm thick wall). The top edge of punch A is impacted then the simultaneous shearing commences. The upper sheared face slides to fit the lower sheared face. The motion stops at the prescribed position. The device is mounted on the low-elastic rubber that is pre-compressed to avoid the damaging excessive force. Test materials are mild steel sheet SPC of 1.0 or 3.2 mm thickness, and pure titanium sheet TP340 of 1.0 or 3.0 mm thickness. Their tensile strengths were 303, 317 and 427, 401 MPa, respectively. Overlap length in sliding stage was varied. Fig.1 Experimental setup Motion of tools and sheets in joining device Motion of the tools and the sheets were observed with a high-speed video camera, in which the joining of TP340 (Upper specimen) and SPC (Lower one) was carried out. Progressive pictures are exhibited in Fig.2. The shear deformation and fracture of SPC are captured at time t: 87.7 and 439 μs, respectively. The left half of SPC moves downwards, then the TP340 also moves downwards after shear fracture. The TP340 appears at 2456 μs thereafter the edges of both materials slide each other with the prescribed overlap length at 3018 μs. The sliding stage terminates at 3333 μs. The device sags due to the redundant energy of the dropweight, where the low-elasticity rubber is compressed. It recovers at 6368 μs. Repulsion and contact between the tool and the drop-weight may occur in addition to the deceleration of the drop-weight, this causes the differences in moving distance of the tools calculated the impact velocity of 10 m/s. Experimental result and discussions Examples of joined specimens are exhibited in Fig.3 for the joining of different materials. No warping of the joined sheet with 1.0 mm thickness is observed, though the joining is not achieved all over the thickness. Sharp gap is observed at both surfaces of 1.0 and 3.0 mm thick sheets. The (a) Photo of setup (b) Joining device Lifting hook","PeriodicalId":415881,"journal":{"name":"Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Similar or dissimilar metallic sheets were joined at their edges by the original impact joining method developed by one of the authors. Surface layers of both sheet edges activated by high-speed shear are immediately contacted with sliding motion in the joining process. The whole processing time is within a few milliseconds. The materials tested were mild steel and titanium sheets. Drop-weight impact testing machine was used. Joining performance of the fabricated sheets was evaluated by tensile test, etc. The joining was not available all over the thickness between sheets, in which sharp notch was observed near both sheet surfaces. The central portion was successfully joined without cavity. The joined specimen of mild steel and titanium was sliced to remove surfaces with such notch. Fracture occurs at the part of mild steel whose strength is lower, then the joining boundary was not damaged. Introduction It is well known that time and temperature effects have important role in solid state joining by atomic diffusion at elevated temperature. On the other hand, under cold condition, if the surface expansion is relatively large, two metal parts can join at the newly created surface, in which the brittle oxidized surface layer fractures. Joining strength in solid state welding was found to be approximately equal to the normal applied stress during the process in the absence of oxide films for the case of aluminum welded together in 1970 [1]. The film theory of such kind of welding or bonding was established, in which roll bonding was applied in 1983 [2]. Recently the film theory was used to derive a model that quantifies the relevance of these parameters to the weld strength [3]. Cold bonding may have a potential for recycling scrap aluminum [4]. The diffusion bonding is usually achieved by very high compressive stress with large plastic deformation. The shape drastically changes from the initial one and the joining strength also depends on the initial surface condition. Surface treatment is necessary for removal of the dirty surface layer. Experimental results in diffusion bonding were summarized for various metals including superplastic alloys [5]. Joining of different metals were tested [6] and experiments were carried out using super plastic materials [7, 8]. Hot isostatic pressing was also effective for the diffusion bonding of the nickel powder onto alumina tubing [9]. Divergent extrusion was used for bonding of aluminum by means of two opposing punches and finite element simulations was conducted [10]. However, the method requires very special conditions in temperature, atmosphere, surface treatment, etc. and they are very time consuming. One of the authors proposed a novel joining method for sheet metal [11]. The edge of the sheet is joined to another edge, where the sheet thickness is unchanged, because the plates are not plastically compressed. In the present study, the materials are mild steel and pure titanium sheets. Main objectives are to observe the motion of the tools and the materials in the device, and to check the Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 91-96 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-16 92 deformation performance of the sheet composed of different materials by tensile and bending tests. The boundary was also inspected by elemental analysis. Experimental device and materials tested The impact joining setup is shown in Fig.1. The device is driven by an impact of drop-weight. The mass was 22 kg and the impact velocity was 10 m/s. The left half of the lower sheet is supported by the counter punch, whose reactive force is given by compressing the circular pipe (A6061, 12 mm diameter and 1 mm thick wall). The top edge of punch A is impacted then the simultaneous shearing commences. The upper sheared face slides to fit the lower sheared face. The motion stops at the prescribed position. The device is mounted on the low-elastic rubber that is pre-compressed to avoid the damaging excessive force. Test materials are mild steel sheet SPC of 1.0 or 3.2 mm thickness, and pure titanium sheet TP340 of 1.0 or 3.0 mm thickness. Their tensile strengths were 303, 317 and 427, 401 MPa, respectively. Overlap length in sliding stage was varied. Fig.1 Experimental setup Motion of tools and sheets in joining device Motion of the tools and the sheets were observed with a high-speed video camera, in which the joining of TP340 (Upper specimen) and SPC (Lower one) was carried out. Progressive pictures are exhibited in Fig.2. The shear deformation and fracture of SPC are captured at time t: 87.7 and 439 μs, respectively. The left half of SPC moves downwards, then the TP340 also moves downwards after shear fracture. The TP340 appears at 2456 μs thereafter the edges of both materials slide each other with the prescribed overlap length at 3018 μs. The sliding stage terminates at 3333 μs. The device sags due to the redundant energy of the dropweight, where the low-elasticity rubber is compressed. It recovers at 6368 μs. Repulsion and contact between the tool and the drop-weight may occur in addition to the deceleration of the drop-weight, this causes the differences in moving distance of the tools calculated the impact velocity of 10 m/s. Experimental result and discussions Examples of joined specimens are exhibited in Fig.3 for the joining of different materials. No warping of the joined sheet with 1.0 mm thickness is observed, though the joining is not achieved all over the thickness. Sharp gap is observed at both surfaces of 1.0 and 3.0 mm thick sheets. The (a) Photo of setup (b) Joining device Lifting hook
金属薄板冲击连接及其性能评价
相似或不同的金属板在其边缘连接由作者之一开发的原始冲击连接方法。在连接过程中,由高速剪切激活的两片板材边缘的表层立即发生滑动运动接触。整个处理时间在几毫秒内。测试的材料是低碳钢和钛板。采用落锤冲击试验机。通过拉伸试验等评价了所制备板材的连接性能。在板材之间的所有厚度上都没有连接,在两个板材表面附近观察到尖锐的缺口。中心部分连接成功,无空腔。将低碳钢与钛的接合试样进行切片,去除表面上的缺口。断裂发生在低碳钢强度较低的部分,连接边界未受到破坏。众所周知,时间和温度效应在原子高温扩散固相连接中起着重要的作用。另一方面,在冷条件下,如果表面膨胀较大,则两个金属部件可以在新形成的表面连接,脆性氧化表面层在此断裂。1970年发现,在没有氧化膜的情况下,固态焊接中的连接强度近似等于铝焊接过程中的正常施加应力[1]。这种焊接或粘接的薄膜理论是在1983年建立的,其中采用了辊焊[2]。最近,薄膜理论被用于导出一个模型,该模型量化了这些参数与焊缝强度的相关性[3]。冷键合可能具有回收废铝的潜力[4]。扩散连接通常是通过非常高的压应力和大的塑性变形来实现的。形状与初始形状相比发生了巨大的变化,连接强度也取决于初始表面条件。表面处理是必要的,以去除脏的表面层。综述了包括超塑性合金在内的各种金属的扩散连接实验结果[5]。对不同金属的连接进行了测试[6],并使用超塑性材料进行了实验[7,8]。热等静压对镍粉在氧化铝管上的扩散键合也是有效的[9]。采用辐散挤压法对铝材进行两对冲接合,并进行有限元模拟[10]。然而,该方法在温度、气氛、表面处理等方面需要非常特殊的条件,而且非常耗时。有作者提出了一种新的钣金连接方法[11]。板材的边缘连接到另一个边缘,其中板材厚度不变,因为板材没有塑料压缩。在本研究中,材料是低碳钢和纯钛板。主要目的是观察工具和材料在装置中的运动,并通过拉伸和弯曲试验,检查爆炸冲击波和高应变率现象materials Research Forum LLC materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 91-96 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-16 92不同材料组成的板材的变形性能。并用元素分析检查了边界。冲击连接装置如图1所示。该装置由落锤的冲击力驱动。质量为22 kg,撞击速度为10 m/s。下片材的左半部分由反冲器支撑,反冲器通过压缩圆管(A6061,直径12mm,壁厚1mm)给予反作用力。A冲头上缘受到冲击,此时开始同步剪切。上剪切面滑动以适应下剪切面。运动在规定的位置停止。该装置安装在预压缩的低弹性橡胶上,避免受力过大造成损坏。试验材料为1.0或3.2 mm厚的低碳钢SPC, 1.0或3.0 mm厚的纯钛TP340。拉伸强度分别为303、317和427、401 MPa。滑动阶段重叠长度变化较大。图1实验设置连接装置中工具与片材的运动通过高速摄像机观察工具与片材的运动,同时进行TP340(上试样)与SPC(下试样)的连接。渐进图如图2所示。在t: 87.7 μs和439 μs时捕获了SPC的剪切变形和断裂。SPC左半段向下移动,TP340剪切断裂后也向下移动。TP340在2456 μs处出现,两种材料的边缘在3018 μs处以规定的重叠长度相互滑动。滑动阶段在3333 μs处终止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信