4. Consideration

E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs
{"title":"4. Consideration","authors":"E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the requirement of consideration; the basic idea, how it works, that it will usually not be a problem because supplying the consideration is generally the whole purpose of the contract (the ‘bargain’), but that the courts will sometimes ‘find’ consideration when none is readily apparent, and will not require it to be of adequate value. It goes on to consider performance of an existing duty by one party as consideration for a new promise by the other party, particularly in the light of the approach taken in Williams v Roffey Bros. It also looks at the related problem (and emphasizes the relationship) of a promise to forego part of a debt in return for payment of part of what is owed in the light of the traditional approach taken in Foakes v Beer, and the recognition of promissory estoppel in High Trees. The significant case of MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd (2016) is explored in detail in this chapter.","PeriodicalId":214244,"journal":{"name":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at the requirement of consideration; the basic idea, how it works, that it will usually not be a problem because supplying the consideration is generally the whole purpose of the contract (the ‘bargain’), but that the courts will sometimes ‘find’ consideration when none is readily apparent, and will not require it to be of adequate value. It goes on to consider performance of an existing duty by one party as consideration for a new promise by the other party, particularly in the light of the approach taken in Williams v Roffey Bros. It also looks at the related problem (and emphasizes the relationship) of a promise to forego part of a debt in return for payment of part of what is owed in the light of the traditional approach taken in Foakes v Beer, and the recognition of promissory estoppel in High Trees. The significant case of MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd (2016) is explored in detail in this chapter.
4. 考虑
本章着眼于考虑的要求;其基本思想是,它是如何工作的,这通常不会是一个问题,因为提供对价通常是合同的全部目的(“交易”),但法院有时会在没有明显的对价时“发现”对价,并且不要求对价具有足够的价值。继续考虑性能的现有义务一方考虑一个新的承诺,另一方,特别是在光的方法在威廉姆斯v Roffey bros .它也看了相关的问题(并强调关系)承诺放弃债务的一部分,以换取支付所欠的一部分的传统方法在各位v啤酒,不得反悔原则的认可在高大的树木。本章详细探讨了MWB商业交流中心有限公司诉Rock广告有限公司(2016)的重要案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信