CFD Modeling and Comparison With Data From the NIST Reference Spray Combustor

D. Crocker, J. Widmann, C. Presser
{"title":"CFD Modeling and Comparison With Data From the NIST Reference Spray Combustor","authors":"D. Crocker, J. Widmann, C. Presser","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/htd-24236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions for spray combustion application has been a challenging task due to difficulties in both modeling and experimental measurements. However, validation is considered to be an essential exercise for the success of CFD tools in the development of future combustion systems. This paper describes a benchmark spray combustion database collected at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and validation of a commercial CFD code using these data. Swirl-stabilized combustion of methanol at lean operating conditions in the NIST reference spray combustor facility was selected to be the baseline case for which both measurements and predictions were made. A comparison is presented of CFD predictions with experimental data for droplet size and velocity, and spray volume flux. The agreement between the CFD calculations and the experimental data is generally good once certain adjustments were made to the measured data close to the injector tip. The adjustments were made based on extrapolation from more accurate downstream measurements. Specification of droplet initial conditions for computational modeling that accurately reflect the laboratory conditions remains a significant issue that needs further improvement.","PeriodicalId":426926,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4 — Combustion and Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/htd-24236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions for spray combustion application has been a challenging task due to difficulties in both modeling and experimental measurements. However, validation is considered to be an essential exercise for the success of CFD tools in the development of future combustion systems. This paper describes a benchmark spray combustion database collected at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and validation of a commercial CFD code using these data. Swirl-stabilized combustion of methanol at lean operating conditions in the NIST reference spray combustor facility was selected to be the baseline case for which both measurements and predictions were made. A comparison is presented of CFD predictions with experimental data for droplet size and velocity, and spray volume flux. The agreement between the CFD calculations and the experimental data is generally good once certain adjustments were made to the measured data close to the injector tip. The adjustments were made based on extrapolation from more accurate downstream measurements. Specification of droplet initial conditions for computational modeling that accurately reflect the laboratory conditions remains a significant issue that needs further improvement.
CFD建模及与NIST参考喷雾燃烧器数据的比较
由于建模和实验测量的困难,喷雾燃烧应用的计算流体动力学(CFD)预测的验证一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。然而,验证被认为是CFD工具在未来燃烧系统开发中取得成功的必要练习。本文介绍了美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)收集的一个基准喷雾燃烧数据库,并利用这些数据验证了一个商业CFD代码。在NIST参考喷雾燃烧器设施中,在精益操作条件下的甲醇旋流稳定燃烧被选为基线案例,用于进行测量和预测。对液滴大小、速度和喷雾体积通量的CFD预测结果与实验数据进行了比较。对喷油器尖端附近的实测数据进行一定的调整后,CFD计算结果与实验数据的一致性较好。这些调整是根据更精确的下游测量结果进行的外推。准确反映实验室条件的计算模型中液滴初始条件的规范仍然是一个需要进一步改进的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信