Epigenetic Paradigm of Critical Rationality in Being Tomorrow by Catherine Malabou

Paweł Korzeb
{"title":"Epigenetic Paradigm of Critical Rationality in Being Tomorrow by Catherine Malabou","authors":"Paweł Korzeb","doi":"10.4467/20843860pk.20.020.12384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MALABOU Abstract: Recent tendencies in theory aim at overcoming the Kantian conception of rationality, ques tioning identification of rationality with critique and the autonomy of thinking subject. Speculative realism attempts to eliminate the transcendental level of thinking that is constitutive for critique, by showing its inconsistency with the contingency of the world discovered through modern science. The development of neurobiology provides a perspective of reduction of the independent level of thinking to the neurobiological activity. Both demand a change in the concept of subjectivity and rationality. However, Catherine Malabou, in her book Being Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality , claims that neither speculative realism nor neurobiology can provide a conception of “another rationality” suffi cient for current demands. In counterpart to the philosophical atmosphere of the 21 st century, Being Tomorrow urges us to construct a new paradigm of critical rationality not against Kant, but through a dialogue with his philosophy. This paper examines Malabou’s proposition of the “epigenetic para digm of rationality”, which connects “epigenetic turn” in neurobiology with the interpretation of Critique of Judgement. Before presenting this paradigm, the article describes the context of the book: the importance of the transcendental for continental philosophy, the speculative realist critique of Kantian rationality and tensions between reductive neuroscience and","PeriodicalId":187788,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860pk.20.020.12384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MALABOU Abstract: Recent tendencies in theory aim at overcoming the Kantian conception of rationality, ques tioning identification of rationality with critique and the autonomy of thinking subject. Speculative realism attempts to eliminate the transcendental level of thinking that is constitutive for critique, by showing its inconsistency with the contingency of the world discovered through modern science. The development of neurobiology provides a perspective of reduction of the independent level of thinking to the neurobiological activity. Both demand a change in the concept of subjectivity and rationality. However, Catherine Malabou, in her book Being Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality , claims that neither speculative realism nor neurobiology can provide a conception of “another rationality” suffi cient for current demands. In counterpart to the philosophical atmosphere of the 21 st century, Being Tomorrow urges us to construct a new paradigm of critical rationality not against Kant, but through a dialogue with his philosophy. This paper examines Malabou’s proposition of the “epigenetic para digm of rationality”, which connects “epigenetic turn” in neurobiology with the interpretation of Critique of Judgement. Before presenting this paradigm, the article describes the context of the book: the importance of the transcendental for continental philosophy, the speculative realist critique of Kantian rationality and tensions between reductive neuroscience and
凯瑟琳·马拉布《明天的存在》中批判理性的表观遗传范式
摘要近年来的理论倾向旨在克服康德的理性概念,质疑理性与批判的同一性以及思维主体的自主性。思辨现实主义试图通过展示其与现代科学发现的世界偶然性的不一致,来消除构成批判的先验思维水平。神经生物学的发展为神经生物学活动的独立思考水平的降低提供了一个视角。两者都要求主体性和理性观念的转变。然而,Catherine Malabou在她的书《成为明天:后生与理性》中声称,思辨现实主义和神经生物学都不能提供一个足以满足当前需求的“另一种理性”的概念。与21世纪的哲学氛围相对应,《明天的存在》敦促我们构建一种新的批判理性范式,而不是反对康德,而是通过与康德哲学的对话。本文考察了马拉布的“理性的表观遗传范式”命题,该命题将神经生物学中的“表观遗传转向”与《判断批判》的解释联系起来。在提出这一范式之前,文章描述了本书的背景:先验对大陆哲学的重要性,对康德理性的思辩现实主义批判以及还原神经科学与哲学之间的紧张关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信