How Shariah Compliance and Traditional Banks Are Performing? A Case of Pakistan

Muhammad Hussain Qureshi, Rukhsana Kalim
{"title":"How Shariah Compliance and Traditional Banks Are Performing? A Case of Pakistan","authors":"Muhammad Hussain Qureshi, Rukhsana Kalim","doi":"10.25272/IJISEF.416706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is conducted with the objective of comparing shariah compliance and traditional banks of Pakistan from performance perspective. The relative investigations are conducted by means of t-test, for the period 2010-2017. Ratios based on CAMEL approach are applied to identify the managerial and financial performance of shariah compliance and traditional banks of Pakistan. It is observed that Shariah compliance banks are significantly better in managing capital appropriacy, managerial competency, earning quality and liquidity as compared to their traditional counterparts. The findings reveal significant implications for policy makers in assessing the capabilities of Shariah compliance and traditional banks in Pakistan, and for ascertaining the direction of future banking system in Pakistan. Findings of the study also underpin awareness and trust in Shariah compliance banks of Pakistan. Furthermore, according to authors information, there is no comprehensive research in Pakistan that differentiate the performance of Shariah compliance and traditional banks by applying CAMEL approach on variables under study as well as on current data set.","PeriodicalId":136568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25272/IJISEF.416706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The study is conducted with the objective of comparing shariah compliance and traditional banks of Pakistan from performance perspective. The relative investigations are conducted by means of t-test, for the period 2010-2017. Ratios based on CAMEL approach are applied to identify the managerial and financial performance of shariah compliance and traditional banks of Pakistan. It is observed that Shariah compliance banks are significantly better in managing capital appropriacy, managerial competency, earning quality and liquidity as compared to their traditional counterparts. The findings reveal significant implications for policy makers in assessing the capabilities of Shariah compliance and traditional banks in Pakistan, and for ascertaining the direction of future banking system in Pakistan. Findings of the study also underpin awareness and trust in Shariah compliance banks of Pakistan. Furthermore, according to authors information, there is no comprehensive research in Pakistan that differentiate the performance of Shariah compliance and traditional banks by applying CAMEL approach on variables under study as well as on current data set.
伊斯兰教法合规和传统银行的表现如何?巴基斯坦的一个例子
本研究的目的是从绩效的角度比较巴基斯坦的伊斯兰教法合规和传统银行。相关调查采用t检验方法进行,时间为2010-2017年。基于CAMEL方法的比率被应用于识别伊斯兰教法合规和巴基斯坦传统银行的管理和财务绩效。我们观察到,与传统银行相比,伊斯兰教法合规银行在管理资本适宜性、管理能力、盈利质量和流动性方面明显更好。研究结果揭示了政策制定者在评估巴基斯坦伊斯兰教法合规和传统银行的能力以及确定巴基斯坦未来银行体系方向方面的重要意义。研究结果还加强了对巴基斯坦遵守伊斯兰教法的银行的认识和信任。此外,根据作者的资料,巴基斯坦没有通过对所研究的变量以及当前数据集应用CAMEL方法来区分遵守伊斯兰教法和传统银行的表现的综合研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信